Tuesday, September 28, 2021

THE MENTAL HEALTH ORDINANCE 2001

 

THE MENTAL HEALTH ORDINANCE 2001

                          (VIII OF 2001)

C O N T E N T S

SECTION                                 HEADING

CHAPTER-I

PRELIMINARY

  1.         Short title, extent and commencement

 2.         Definitions

CHAPTER-II

ESTABLISHMENT OF PUNJAB MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY.

    3.         Punjab Mental Health Authority

   4.         Constitution of Board of Visitors

  5.         Powers and functions of the Board


            6.         Establishment of psychiatric facilities by the Government

CHAPTER-III

ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT

    7.         Care in the Community

     8.         Care and Treatment on an informal or voluntary basis


            9.         Duration for periods of detention for assessment, treatment, urgent admission and emergency holding


            10.       Admission for assessment


            11.       Admission for treatment


            12.       Admission for assessment in cases of urgency


            13.       Emergency Holding


            14.       Emergency Powers


            15.       Application by whom to be presented


            16.       Effect of application for admission


            17.       General provisions as to applications and medical recommendations


            18.       Rectification of applications and recommendations


            19.       Mentally disordered persons found in public places


 


CHAPTER-IV


LEAVE AND DISCHARGE


            20.       Order of leave


            21.       Discharge of a patient


            22.       Application by a patient for discharge


            23.       Discharge of a detained person found not to be mentally disordered after assessment


            24.       Duty of hospital management to inform relatives of the discharge


            25.       Application for discharge to Magistrate


            26.       Notice about serious illness or death


            27.       Transfer and removal


            28.       Foreign nationals


 


CHAPTER-V


JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN OF PERSON AND MANAGER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE MENTALLY DISORDERED


            29.       Judicial proceedings


            30.       Regulation of proceedings of the Court of Protection


            31.       Inquiry by subordinate Court on commission issued by the Court of Protection and proceedings thereon


            32.       Appointment of guardian


            33.       Management of property of mentally disordered person


            34.       Responsibility of manager


            35.       Allowance payable to guardian


            36.       Powers of manager of property of mentally disordered person


            37.       Furnishing of inventory of immovable property, etc


            38.       Inquiry by Court of Protection in certain cases


            39.       Disposal of business premises under the direction of Court of Protection


            40.       Investment of assets of mentally disordered person


            41.       Appointment of a new manager or guardian


            42.       Dissolution of partnership


            43.       Securities, etc., of mentally disordered person


            44.       Maintenance during temporary mental disorder


            45.       Inquiry by Court of Protection into cessation of mental disorder


            46.       Appeal to High Court


 


 


 


CHAPTER-VI


LIABILITY TO MEET COST OF MAINTENANCE OF MENTALLY DISORDERED PERSON ADMITTED IN A PSYCHIATRIC FACILITY


            47.       Liability to meet cost of maintenance of a patient admitted in a psychiatric facility


            48.       Maintenance out of pay, pension, etc


 


CHAPTER-VII


PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF MENTALLY DISORDERED PERSONS


            49.       Cases of attempted suicide


            50.       Confidentiality


            51.       Informed consent


 


CHAPTER-VIII


OFFENCES AND INDEMNITY


            52.       Penalty for making false statement, etc


            53.       Indemnity


 


CHAPTER-IX


INSPECTION OF MENTALLY DISORDERED PRISONERS


            54.       Inspection of mentally disordered prisoners


 


 


CHAPTER-X


FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES


            55.       Forensic psychiatric services


 


CHAPTER-XI


MISCELLANEOUS


            56.       Specialized Psychiatric Treatments


            57.       Provisions for public and private sector psychiatric facilities


            58.       Removal of difficulties


            59.       Power to make rules


            60.       Ordinance to override


            61.       Repeal and saving



 


 



[1]THE MENTAL HEALTH ORDINANCE 2001


(VIII OF 2001)


[20th February 2001]


An Ordinance to consolidate and amend the law relating to the mentally disordered persons with respect to their care and treatment, the management of their property and other related matters.


WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to the treatment and care of mentally disordered persons, to make better provisions for their care, treatment, management of properties and affairs and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto and to encourage community care of such mentally disordered persons and further to provide for the promotion of mental health and prevention of mental disorder;


AND WHEREAS the National Assembly and the Senate stand suspended in pursuance of the Proclamation of Emergency of the fourteenth day of October, 1999, and the Provisional Constitution Order No. 1 of 1999;


AND WHEREAS the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary to take immediate action;


NOW, THEREFORE, in pursuance of the Proclamation of Emergency of the fourteenth day of October, 1999, and the Provisional Constitution Order No. 1 of 1999, read with the Provisional Constitution (Amendment) Order No. 9 of 1999, and in exercise of all powers enabling him in that behalf, the President of the Republic of Pakistan is pleased to make and promulgate the following Ordinance:-


CHAPTER I


PRELIMINARY


1. Short title, extent and commencement.– (1) This Ordinance may be called the Mental Health Ordinance, 2001.


(2)  It extends to the whole of [2][Punjab].


(3)  It shall come into force with effect from the 20th day of February, 2001.


2. Definitions.– (1) In this Ordinance, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, –


(a)     “approved psychiatrist” means a medical practitioner possessing a recognized postgraduate qualification and registered with the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council and also approved by the Authority;


(b)     “Authority” means the [3][Punjab Mental Health Authority] constituted under section 3;


(c)     “cost of maintenance” in relation to a mentally disordered person, includes the cost of lodging, maintenance, clothing, medicine and care of a mentally disordered person and any expenditure incurred in removing such mentally disordered person to and from a psychiatric facility together with any other charges specified in this behalf by the Government;


(d)    “Court of Protection” means a District Court having jurisdiction under this Ordinance in matters specified herein and designated as such by the Government;


(e)     “Court” means a Court of Protection;


[4][(f)   “Government” means Government of the Punjab;]


(g)     “health facility” means any basic health unit, rural health centre, tehsil hospital, district hospital, teaching hospital and any private medical facility, supervised by a medical practitioner;


(h)     “hospital management” means personnel operating and or managing any psychiatric facility or a health facility that has provision for indoor treatment for the mentally disordered;


(i)      “informed consent” means voluntary and continuing permission of the patient or if the patient is a minor, his nearest relative or guardian, as the case may be, for assessment or to receive a particular treatment based on an adequate knowledge of the purpose, nature, likely effects, and risks of that treatment including the likelihood of its success and any alternatives to it and the cost of treatment;


(j)      “Magistrate” means a Judicial Magistrate of the first class specially empowered by the Government to perform functions and exercise powers of a Magistrate under this Ordinance;


(k)     “medical officer” means a medical graduate serving in a Government health facility and registered with the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council;


(l)      “medical practitioner” means a medical graduate registered with the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council with good standing;


(m)    “mental disorder” means mental illness, including mental impairment, severe personality disorder, severe mental impairment and any other disorder or disability of mind and “mentally disordered” shall be construed accordingly and as explained hereunder:


(i)      “mental impairment” means a state of arrested or incomplete development of mind (not amounting to severe mental impairment) which includes significant impairment of intelligence and social functioning and is associated with abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct on the part of the person concerned and “mentally impaired” shall be construed accordingly;


(ii)     “severe personality disorder” means a persistent disorder or disability of mind (whether or not including significant impairment of intelligence) which results in abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct on the part of the person concerned;


(iii)    “severe mental impairment” means a state of arrested or incomplete development of mind which includes severe impairment of intelligence and social functioning and is associated with abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct on the part of the person concerned and “severely mentally impaired” shall be construed accordingly;


Explanation:- Nothing contained in clause (m), sub-clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) above shall be construed as implying that a person may be dealt with under this Ordinance as suffering from mental disorder or from any other form of such mental disorder defined in this section, by reason only of promiscuity or other immoral conduct, sexual deviancy or dependence on alcohol or drugs;


(n)     “mentally disordered prisoner” means a person, who is a prisoner for whose detention in or removal to a psychiatric facility or other place of safety, an order has been made in accordance with the provisions of section 466 or section 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (Act V of 1898), section 30 of the Prisoners Act, 1900 (III of 1900), section 130 of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 (XXXIX of 1952), section 143 of the Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953 (VI of 1953) or section 123 of the Pakistan Navy Ordinance, 1961 (XXXV of 1961);


(o)     “minor” means a child or adolescent not having attained the age of eighteen years;


(p)     “patient” means a person who is under treatment and care;


(q)     “place of safety” means a Government run health facility, a psychiatric facility, or residence of any suitable relative who is willing to temporarily receive the patient;


(r)     “prescribed” means prescribed by rules or regulations, as the case may be, made under this Ordinance;


(s)     “psychiatric facility” means a hospital, institute, ward, clinic, nursing home, day-care institution, half-way house, whether in public or private sector involved in the care of mentally disordered persons;


(t)     “psychiatrist” means a medical practitioner possessing a recognized postgraduate qualification in psychiatry and registered with the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council;


(u)     “relative” means and includes any person related by blood or marriage or adoption under the personal law, with the mentally disordered person;


(v)     “rules” means the rules made under this Ordinance;


(w)    “specialized psychiatric treatments” means electro-convulsive treatment, anti-psychotic depot injection, psychosurgery, and such other form of treatment as may be specified for the purposes of this Ordinance; and


(x)     “treatment of mentally disordered person” means the assessment and treatment of a mentally disordered person and shall include assessment, care, training, habilitation as well as rehabilitation techniques or measures, as the case may be.


CHAPTER II


ESTABLISHMENT OF [5][PUNJAB MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY]


3. [6][Punjab Mental Health Authority].– (1) For the purposes of this Ordinance, the [7][Government] shall constitute, by notification in the official Gazette, the [8][Punjab Mental Health Authority].


[9][(2)  The Authority shall consist of a Chairperson and not more than ten members to be appointed by the Government.]


[10][(3)    The members of the Authority shall be as follows:-


         (i)      Secretary to the Government, Health Department;


         (ii)     Chief Consultant Psychiatrist, Punjab Institute of Mental Health, Lahore; and


         (iii)    three eminent psychiatrists and two eminent psychologists of at least ten years’ standing.]


(4)  The Chairperson and the members of the Authority, other than ex-officio members, shall be appointed on such terms and conditions as may be determined by the [11][Government].


(5)  The Chairperson and the members of the Authority shall be appointed for a tenure of fours years. The Chairperson and a member may resign from his office in writing addressed to the [12][Government].


(6)  The Chairperson or a member of the Authority may be removed from his office by the [13][Government], for reasons of misconduct, or if he is unable to perform functions of his office, on account of mental or physical incapacity or for any other reason.


(7)  The Authority established under sub-section (1) shall carry out the following functions–


(a)     advise the Government on all matters relating to promotion of mental health and prevention of mental disorder;


(b)     develop and establish new national standards for care and treatment of patients;


(c)     recommend measures to improve existing mental health services and setting up of child and adolescence, psychogeriatric, forensic, learning disability and community based services;


(d)    prescribe procedures with respect to setting up and functioning of the mental health services and facilities;


(e)     prescribe a code of practice to be implemented for achieving the purposes and objects of this Ordinance as well as to be followed by all the mental health personnel involved with the care of patients under this Ordinance;


(f)     provide for regular review by the Board of Visitors to ensure that the provisions of this Ordinance for assessment and treatment are being properly carried out, whether or not requested by any individual, patient or his relative;


(g)     prescribe for care, aftercare or rehabilitation, under supervision or otherwise;


(h)     provide for and regulate the setting up of help lines and crisis centres for the general public with regard to mental health;


(i)      provide for, organize and regulate public awareness programs and promote research, publish journals, bulletins, magazines, and other educational material on mental health issues;


(j)      discharge such other functions with respect to matters relating to mental health as the Government may require;


(k)     register psychiatrists for the purposes of this Ordinance, in such manner as may be prescribed; and


(l)      arrange and organize such courses and training programs as may be necessary for carrying out the purposes and objects of this Ordinance.


(8)  The Authority may, by notification in the official gazette, make regulations in respect of functions specified in subsection (7).


4. Constitution of Board of Visitors.– (1) The Authority shall, in consultation with the Government [14][* * *], establish Boards of Visitors for carrying out the purposes of this Ordinance as hereinafter provided.


(2)  There shall be a Board of Visitors [15][* * *] which shall consist of:


(a)     A Chairperson who is or has been a Judge of the High Court;


(b)     two psychiatrists, one having a minimum experience of ten years in Government service;


(c)     one prominent citizen of good standing;


(d)    two medical practitioners of repute with a minimum standing of twelve years, one of whom shall be a nominee of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council; and


(e)     Director General Health Services [16][* * *], or his nominee.


(3)  The Chairperson and members of the Board shall be appointed for a tenure of two years.


(4)  No member shall be deputed to perform any duty as a visitor to a psychiatric facility wherein he has a direct or indirect conflict of interest.


5. Powers and functions of the Board.– (1) The Board may, at any time, enter and inspect any psychiatric facility within its area of responsibility and require the production of any records and documents for inspection to ensure that they are in proper order.


(2)  The Board shall periodically inspect every part of a psychiatric facility and examine as far as possible every patient and mentally disordered prisoner. The Board shall inspect records and documents relating to the patients and mentally disordered prisoners since last visitation by the Board.


(3)  The Board may make recommendations to a psychiatric facility, the Authority and the Government, concerning improvement of conditions of such facility.


(4)  The Authority may order the Board to visit any patient in case it appears necessary for the purpose of investigating any particular matter, or matters related to the capacity of the patient to manage his property and affairs, or otherwise, relating to the exercise of its functions. In compliance of this order, the Board may visit the facility or nominate a sub-committee of not less than two members:-


(a)     the Board or the sub-committee, making a visit under this sub-section shall make such report on the visit as the Authority may order;


(b)     the Board or the sub-committee, making a visit under this sub-section may interview and examine a patient in private and may require the production of and inspect any documents and/or medical records relating to the patient;


(c)     where the sub-committee visits a facility it shall report to the Board and the Board shall make its final report to the Authority; and


(d)    where the Board or a sub-committee is to visit a mentally disordered prisoner, it shall also include the Inspector General of Prisons, or his nominee.


(5)  Where the Board is satisfied that any patient in a psychiatric facility is not receiving proper care or treatment, it may report the matter to the Authority which may issue such directions as it may deem fit to the medical practitioner, or psychiatrist in charge of the psychiatric facility, as the case may be, who shall be bound to comply with such directions.


(6)  The Board shall enter remarks in a register to be kept for that purpose in regard to the management and condition of a psychiatric facility and the inmates therein.


(7)  Any information obtained by any member of the Board in the course of his duties or which comes to the knowledge otherwise, shall not be disclosed except to the authorised person(s).


6. Establishment of psychiatric facilities by the Government.– [17][(1)  The Government may establish or maintain psychiatric facilities for the assessment, admission, treatment, rehabilitation, care and after care of mentally disordered patients at such places, as it deems fit.]


(2)  The psychiatric facilities established under sub-section (1) may organize or maintain separate units for –


(a)     persons who are above the age of eighteen years;


(b)     child and adolescence psychiatric units;


(c)     psychogeriatric units for the elderly; and


(d)    persons who have been convicted of any offence and are mentally disordered for whom special security measures shall be required.


(3)  Where drug dependence units need to be established, they shall be set up separately which may be within the premises of the psychiatric facility for people who are not mentally disordered but have drug dependence or patients with drug induced behavioural changes.


CHAPTER III


ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT


7. Care in the Community.– (1) Community based mental health services shall be set up for providing mentally disordered persons, their families and others involved in their care with guidance, education, rehabilitation, after care and preventive measures and other support services on an informal basis.


Explanation.– For the purposes of this section, community shall include, family, home, workplace, educational institutions and other places where care and after care can be provided on an informal or voluntary basis.


8. Care and Treatment on an informal or voluntary basis.– Any person who himself seeks or is brought by a relative or is referred by a medical practitioner or is referred by any authority for forensic psychiatric assessment, shall be examined by a psychiatrist or a medical officer nominated by him who shall record his findings in writing and decide that the patient be treated on an out-patient basis or otherwise. Any such person on withdrawal of his consent may be discharged in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.


9. Duration for periods of detention for assessment, treatment, urgent admission and emergency holding.– For the purposes of this Ordinance, there are four types of detention of a patient, namely; (1) admission for assessment, (2) admission for treatment, (3) urgent admission, and (4) emergency holding. The duration for each type of detention shall be as follows:-


(a)     The period of detention for the purposes of assessment shall be up to 28 days from the date of application made under section 10;


(b)     The period of detention for the purposes of treatment shall be up to six months from the date of application made under section 11, and is renewable under the provisions of the said section;


(c)     The period of detention for the purposes of urgent admission shall be up to 72 hours from the time of application made under section 12; and


(d)    The period of detention in the case of a patient for the purposes of emergency holding already in hospital, shall be up to 24 hours from the time of application made under section 13.


10. Admission for assessment.– (1) A patient may be admitted to a Psychiatric Facility and detained there for the period allowed by subsection (4) in pursuance of an application made in accordance with subsections (2) and (3).


(2)  An application for admission for assessment may be made in respect of a patient on the grounds that –


(a)     he is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which warrants the detention of the patient in a psychiatric facility for assessment (or for assessment followed by initial treatment) for at least a limited period; and


(b)     he ought to be so detained in the interests of his own health or safety or with a view to the protection of other persons; and


(c)     specifying that care and treatment in the community and on an informal and voluntary basis is not possible.


(3)  An application for admission for assessment shall be founded on the written recommendations in the prescribed form of two medical practitioners, one of whom should be a medical officer and one should be a psychiatrist, or where a psychiatrist is not available, a medical practitioner with experience in psychiatry, including in each case a statement that in the opinion of such medical practitioners the conditions set out in sub-section (2) above are complied with.


(4)  A patient admitted to a psychiatric facility in pursuance of an application for admission for assessment may be detained for a period not exceeding 28 days beginning with the day on which application was made under this section, but shall not be detained after the expiration of that period unless before it has expired he has become liable to be detained by virtue of a subsequent application, order or direction under the provisions of this Ordinance.


(5)  Where a psychiatrist deems it fit he may discharge the patient from detention and advise the patient to continue treatment on voluntary basis.


(6)  The patient, his relative or guardian shall have the right of filing only one appeal against the order of detention under this section to a Court of Protection within a period of 14 days from the day on which the application was made. The decision of the Court of Protection shall be final for the period of detention under this section.


11. Admission for treatment.– (1) A patient may be admitted to a psychiatric facility and detained there for the period allowed by the following provisions, in pursuance of an application made in accordance with this section.


(2)  An application for admission for treatment may be made in respect of a patient on the grounds that –


(a)     he is suffering from mental illness, severe mental impairment, severe personality disorder or mental impairment and his mental disorder is of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to receive medical treatment in a psychiatric facility; and


(b)     it is necessary for the health or safety of the patient or for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment and it cannot be provided unless he is admitted under this section.


(3)  An application for admission for treatment shall be founded on the written recommendations, on the prescribed form of two medical officers, one of whom shall be an approved psychiatrist, including in each case a statement that in the opinion of such medical officers the conditions set out in sub-section (2) above are complied with; and each such recommendation shall include–


(a)     such particulars as may be prescribed of the grounds for that opinion so far as it relates to the conditions set out in clause (a) of that sub-section; and


(b)     a statement of the reason for that opinion so far as it relates to the conditions set out in clause (b) of that sub-section, specifying, whether other methods of dealing with the patient are available and, if so, why they are not appropriate.


(4)  A patient admitted to a psychiatric facility in pursuance of an application under this section may be detained in a psychiatric facility, for a period not exceeding six months allowed by clause (b) of section 9 but shall not be so detained or kept for any longer period unless the authority for his detention is renewed under this section–


(a)     the authority for detention of a patient may, unless the patient has previously been discharged, be renewed from the expiration of the period of six months referred to in sub-section above, for a further period of six months;


(b)     from the expiration of any period of renewal under clause (a) above, for a further period of one year, if necessary and so on for periods of one year at a time.


(5)  The patient, his relative or guardian may file an appeal against the order of detention under this section to a Court of Protection:


Provided that only one appeal shall lie during the subsistence of each period of detention.


12. Admission for assessment in cases of urgency.– In any case of urgent necessity, an application for admission for assessment may be made in respect of a patient in accordance with the following provisions –


(i)      an urgent application may be made either by a relative of the patient or medical officer; and every such application shall include a statement that it is of urgent necessity for the patient to be admitted and detained under this section and that compliance with the provisions relating to an application for treatment, under section 11 would involve undesirable delay;


(ii)     an urgent application shall be sufficient in the first instance if founded on the medical recommendation of an approved psychiatrist or his nominated medical officer and if practicable, the nominated medical officer shall not be the same medical officer referred to in sub-clause (i) above;


(iii)    an urgent application shall cease to have effect after 72 hours from the time when the patient is admitted under this section to the psychiatric facility unless –


(a)     the second medical recommendation required by section 11 above is given and received by the psychiatrist in-charge of the facility within the said period of 72 hours; and


(b)     that such recommendation and the recommendation referred to in sub-clause (ii) above together comply with all the requirements as contained in section 17.


13. Emergency Holding.– If in the case of a patient who is receiving treatment for mental disorder as an inpatient in a psychiatric facility who wishes or attempts to leave and it appears to a medical officer –


(i)      that the patient is suffering from mental disorder to such a degree that it is necessary for his health or safety or for the protection of others, for him to be prevented from leaving the facility, and


(ii)     that it is not practicable to secure the immediate attendance of the psychiatrist in charge or his nominated medical officer for the purpose of furnishing a medical recommendation,


the medical officer shall record that fact in writing and in that event the patient may be detained in the hospital for a period of 24 hours from the time when the fact is so recorded or until the earlier arrival of the psychiatrist in charge or his nominated medical officer.


14. Emergency Powers.– Where in case of an emergency a medical practitioner is unable to obtain informed consent in writing, he may administer treatment, notwithstanding the provisions of section 51, that in his professional opinion, is necessary for:-


(i)      saving the patient’s life; or


(ii)     preventing serious deterioration of his condition; or


(iii)    alleviating serious suffering by the patient; or


(iv)    preventing the patient from behaving violently or being a danger to himself or to others.


15. Application by whom to be presented.– (1) Subject to the provisions of subsection (3), the application on a prescribed form shall be presented by the husband or wife of the patient or, if there is no husband or wife or the husband or wife is prevented by reason of mental disorder, absence from Pakistan or otherwise from making the presentation, by the nearest relative of the patient.


(2)  If the application is not presented by the husband or wife, or, where there is no husband or wife, by the nearest relative of the patient, the application shall contain a statement of the reasons why it is not so presented, by the husband, wife or the nearest relative and of the connection of the applicant with the patient, and the circumstances under which he presents the application.


(3)  No person shall present an application unless he has attained the age of majority and has within fourteen days before the presentation of the application, personally seen the said patient.


(4)  The application shall be signed and verified by the applicant, and the statement of prescribed particulars by the person making such statement.


16. Effect of application for admission.– (1) An application for the admission of a patient to a psychiatric facility under this Ordinance, duly completed in accordance with the section under which he is being admitted, shall be sufficient authority for the applicant or any person authorized by the applicant, to take the patient and convey him to a psychiatric facility at any time within the following periods, that is to say–


(a)     in the case of an application made other than an emergency application within the period of 14 days beginning with the date from which the patient was last examined by an approved Psychiatrist or medical officer, as the case may be, before giving a medical recommendation for the purposes of the application;


(b)     in the case of an emergency application, under section 12, the period of 24 hours beginning at the time when the patient was examined by an approved psychiatrist or his nominated medical officer giving the medical recommendation which is referred to in section 11 above, or at the time when the application is made, whichever is the earlier.


(2)  Where a patient is admitted within the said period to a psychiatric facility as mentioned in sub-section (1), on an application made under sections10, 11 or 12, as the case may be, the application shall be sufficient authority for the hospital management to detain the patient in the said facility in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.


(3)  Any application for the admission of a patient under sections 10, 11 or 12, as the case may be, and which appears to be duly made and is founded on the necessary medical recommendations, may be acted upon without further proof of the signature or qualification of the person by whom the application or any such medical recommendation is made or given or of any matter of fact or opinion stated therein.


(4)  Once a patient is admitted to a psychiatric facility in pursuance of an application for admission for treatment, any previous application under this Ordinance by virtue of which he was detained in a psychiatric facility shall cease to have effect.


17. General provisions as to applications and medical recommendations.– (1) General provisions as to applications:-


(a)     subject to provisions of this section, an application for admission for assessment or for treatment may be made either by the nearest relative of the patient, by an approved psychiatrist or nominated medical officer; and every such application shall specify the qualification of the applicant to make such an application;


(b)     every application for admission shall be addressed to the hospital management to which admission is sought;


(c)     before or within a reasonable time after an application for the admission of a patient for assessment is made by an approved psychiatrist or a nominated medical officer, as the case may be, he shall take such steps as are practicable to inform the person (if any) appearing to be the nearest relative of the patient, that the application is to be or has been made;


(d)    none of the applications mentioned in sub-section (1) above shall be made by any person in respect of a patient unless that person has personally seen the patient within the period of 14 days ending with the date of application;


(e)     any recommendation given for the purposes of an application for admission for treatment, may describe the patient as suffering from more than one form of mental disorder, namely, severe mental impairment, severe personality disorder, mental impairment, or any other disorder or disability of mind:


Provided that the application shall be of no effect unless the patient is described in each of the recommendations as suffering from the same form of mental disorder whether or not he is also described in either of those recommendations as suffering from another form.


(f)     each of the applications mentioned in subsection (1) above shall be sufficient if the recommendations on which it is founded are given either as separate recommendations, or as a joint recommendation signed by the medical officer and a psychiatrist.


(2)  General provisions as to medical recommendations:-


(a)     where recommendations are required for the purposes of an application under this Ordinance, they shall be signed on or before the date of the application, and shall be given by a medical officer or an approved psychiatrist who have examined the patient either together or separately, but where they have examined the patient separately not more than five days must have elapsed between the days on which those separate examinations took place;


(b)     of the medical recommendations given for the purposes of any application as referred under clause (a) above, one shall be given by an approved psychiatrist and unless that psychiatrist has previous acquaintance with the patient, the other such recommendation shall, if practicable, be given by a medical officer who has such previous acquaintance.


18. Rectification of applications and recommendations.– (1) If within the period of 14 days beginning with the day on which application was made in respect of the patient to be admitted to a psychiatric facility for assessment or for treatment the application or any medical recommendation given for the purposes of the application, is found to in any respect incorrect or defective, the recommendation or application may, within that period and with the consent of the management of the psychiatric facility, be amended by the person by whom it was signed; and upon such amendment being made the application or recommendation shall have effect and shall be deemed to have had effect as if it had been originally made as so amended.


(2)  Without prejudice to sub-section (1) above, if within the period mentioned in that sub-section it appears to the management of the psychiatric facility that one of the two medical recommendations on which the application for admission of a patient is founded is insufficient to warrant the detention of the patient in pursuance of the application, they may, within that period, give notice in writing to that effect to the applicant; and where any such notice is given in respect of a medical recommendation, that recommendation shall be disregarded, but the application shall be, deemed always to have been, sufficient if –


(a)     a fresh recommendation complying with the relevant provisions of this Ordinance (other than the provisions relating to the time of signature and the interval between examinations) is furnished to the hospital management within that period; and


(b)     the fresh recommendation, and the other recommendation given earlier on which the application is founded, together comply with those provisions.


(3)  Where the medical recommendations upon which an application for admission is founded are, taken together, insufficient to warrant the detention of the patient in pursuance of the application, notice under subsection (2) above may be given in respect of either of those recommendations; but this subsection shall not apply in a case where the application is of no effect by virtue of clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 17 above.


(4)  Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the giving of notice in respect of an application made as an emergency application, or the detention of a patient admitted in pursuance of such an application after the period of 72 hours referred to in clause (iii) of section 12 above unless the conditions set out in clauses (a) and (b) of that section are complied with or would be complied with apart from any error or defect to which this applies.


19. Mentally disordered persons found in public places.– (1) If an officer in charge of a police station finds in a place to which the public have access, a person whom he has reason to believe, is suffering from a mental disorder and to be in immediate need of care or control the said officer may, if he thinks it necessary to do so in the interest of that person or for the protection of other persons, remove that person to a place of safety, which means only a Government run health facility, a government run psychiatric facility, or hand him over to any suitable relative who is willing to temporarily receive the patient.


(2)  A person removed to a place of safety under this section may be detained there for a period not exceeding 72 hours for the purpose of enabling him to be examined by a psychiatrist or his nominated medical officer and for making any necessary arrangements for his treatment or care.


CHAPTER IV


LEAVE AND DISCHARGE


20. Order of leave.– (1) An application in the prescribed form, for leave of absence in regard to any mentally disordered person (not being a mentally disordered prisoner) who is formally admitted in any psychiatric facility may be made to the psychiatrist in charge of the facility, by a relative who is desirous of taking care and custody of such mentally disordered person for a specified period, requesting that he may be allowed on his application to take care and custody of such a patient and subject to the assessment by a psychiatrist, in charge of the said facility, who may allow or deny the said application:


Provided that no application under this sub-section shall be made by a person who has not attained the age of majority.


(2)  Every application under sub-section (1) shall be accompanied by an undertaking-


(a)     to take proper care of the mentally ill patient;


(b)     to prevent the mentally ill patient from causing injury to himself or to others; and


(c)     to bring back the mentally ill patient to the said facility on the expiry of the period of leave.


(3)  On receipt of the application under sub-section (1), the psychiatrist in charge may grant leave of absence to the mentally ill person for such period as he may deem necessary and subject to such conditions as may, in the interests of the personal safety of the mentally ill patient or for the protection of others, be specified in the order.


(4)  In case a patient is not returned by the relative after a specified period of leave, the said psychiatrist shall report to the magistrate, in whose jurisdiction the psychiatric facility is situated, and the referring authority and the Magistrate if satisfied, may direct the police to recover and return the said patient to the psychiatric facility.


(5)  In any case where a patient is absent from a psychiatric facility in pursuance of order of leave granted under this section and it appears to the psychiatrist that is it necessary to do so in the interest of the patients’ safety or for the protection of other persons, he may by notice in writing given to the patient or to the person for the time being in-charge of the patient, revoke the leave of absence and recall the patient to the psychiatric facility.


(6)  If after the passage of reasonable time after the notice as given under sub-section (5) above, the patient does not return or is not returned, then the psychiatrist may report to the Magistrate and the referring authority of the reasons of revoking the leave of absence.


(7)  If the Magistrate is satisfied with the report of the psychiatrist and the reasons as mentioned in this section, he may direct the police to locate and produce the patient before him on a specified date and the Magistrate after hearing the patient, the person in charge and the concerned psychiatrist or their representatives, may make an order placing the patient in the psychiatric facility or allow him to continue being in the care and custody of the person in charge or may make such other orders as he may deem fit.


(8)  Without prejudice to what has been stated above in this section, the period of detention under provisions of section 10 or 11 shall continue during the period for which order of leave was granted:


Provided that a patient in whose favour order of leave has been granted under this section shall not be recalled, after he has ceased to be liable to be detained for the periods specified under section 10 or 11, unless he is absent, at the expiration of period specified under the above referred sections, without leave from the psychiatric facility.


21. Discharge of a patient.– (1) The psychiatrist in-charge of the treatment of a patient, may by order in writing, direct discharge of the patient at any time he deems it appropriate.


(2)  Where any order of discharge is made under sub-section (1), in respect of a person who has been admitted or is undergoing treatment as a patient in pursuance of an order of a referring authority, a copy of such order shall be immediately forwarded to that authority by the psychiatrist in charge.


(3)  Any person admitted in a psychiatric facility under an order made in pursuance of an application made under this Ordinance, may be discharged on an application made to the psychiatrist in charge:


Provided that no patient shall be discharged under this section if the psychiatrist in charge certifies in writing that the patient is unfit to be discharged for reasons of his own health and safety or the safety of others.


22. Application by a patient for discharge.– (1) Any patient, not being a mentally disordered prisoner, who feels that he has recovered from his mental disorder, may make an application to the Magistrate for his discharge from the psychiatric facility.


(2)  The Magistrate may after making such inquiry as he may deem fit, pass an order discharging the person or dismiss the application:


Provided that no subsequent application for discharge shall be made by the patient during the said period of detention.


23. Discharge of a detained person found not to be mentally disordered after assessment.– If any person admitted in a psychiatric facility is subsequently found not to be mentally disordered and is capable of taking care of himself and managing his affairs, an approved psychiatrist, of the said facility shall forthwith, discharge such person from the psychiatric facility and notify the fact to the referring authority and the nearest relative.


24. Duty of hospital management to inform relatives of the discharge.– Where a patient detained under this Ordinance in a psychiatric facility is to be discharged, the management of the psychiatric facility shall take such steps as are practicable to inform the relative (if any), of the patient and or the applicant (if any), and or any suitable person who is willing to accept the responsibility to take care and custody of the said patient; and that information shall, if practicable, be given at least seven days before the date of discharge.


25. Application for discharge to Magistrate.– Where any patient is admitted under section 10 or 11, his relatives may apply to the Magistrate within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the psychiatric facility is situated for his discharge and the Magistrate may, in consultation with psychiatrist in charge of the treatment, after giving notice to the person at whose instance he was admitted and after making such inquiry as he may deem fit, either allow or dismiss the application:


Provided that no subsequent application for discharge shall be made during the said period of detention.


26. Notice about serious illness or death.– If a patient becomes seriously ill or dies, that fact shall be notified to his nearest relatives, if known or on whose application the patient was admitted and also to the authority by whom the patient was referred to the psychiatric facility.


27. Transfer and removal.– Transfer and removal of patient placed in a psychiatric facility to another such facility in [18][any other Province or territory of Pakistan] shall be carried out in accordance with any general or special order of the [19][Government with the consent of the Government of that Province or territory], provided that a notice of such intended transfer or removal has been given to the applicant.


28. Foreign nationals.– (1) When an arrangement has been made with any foreign state with respect to the placement of a patient, the Federal Government may issue a notification under this Ordinance directing the [20][Government for such placement of the patient].


(2)  On publication of a notification under sub-section (1), the agent of the foreign state in which the alleged mentally disordered person ordinarily resides may make an application for an order to the [21][Government].


(3)  The functions of the Magistrate shall be performed by such officer as the [22][* *] Government may by general or special order appoint in this behalf, and such officer shall be deemed to be the Magistrate having jurisdiction over the alleged mentally disordered person for the purposes of this section.


(4)  The [23][* *] Government may specify approved psychiatrists for the purposes of this section.


CHAPTER V


JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN OF PERSON AND MANAGER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE MENTALLY DISORDERED


29. Judicial proceedings.– Whenever any person is possessed of property and is alleged to be mentally disordered, the Court of Protection, within whose jurisdiction such person is residing may, upon application by any of his relatives having obtained consent in writing of the [24][Advocate General Punjab], by order direct an inquiry for the purpose of ascertaining whether such person is mentally disordered and incapable of managing himself, his property and his affairs.


30. Regulation of proceedings of the Court of Protection.– (1) The following provisions shall regulate the proceedings of the Court of Protection with regard to the matter to which they relate, namely:-


(a)     notice shall be given to the mentally disordered person of the time and place at which it is proposed to hold the inquiry;


(b)     if it appears that personal service on the alleged mentally disordered person would be ineffectual, the Court may direct such substituted service of notice as it thinks fit;


(c)     the Court may also direct copy of such notice to be served upon any relative of the alleged mentally disordered person and upon any other person to whom in the opinion of the Court notice of the application should be given;


(d)    the Court may require the alleged mentally disordered person to attend, at such convenient time and place as it may appoint for the purpose of being personally examined by the Court, or to any person from whom the Court may desire to have a report of the mental capacity and condition of such mentally disordered person;


(e)     the Court may likewise make an order authorising any person or persons therein named to have access to the alleged mentally disordered person for the purpose of personal examination; and


(f)     the attendance and examination of the alleged mentally disordered person under the provisions of clause (d) and clause (e) shall, if the alleged mentally disordered person be a woman who, according to customs of the country, ought not to be compelled to appear in public, be regulated by the law and practice for the examination of such persons in other civil cases.


(2)  The Court, if it thinks fit, may appoint two or more persons to act as assessors to the Court in the said proceedings.


(3)  Upon the completion of the inquiry, the Court shall determine whether the alleged mentally disordered person is suffering from mental disorder and is incapable of managing himself and his affairs, or may come to a special finding that such person lacks the capacity to manage his affairs, but is capable of managing himself and is not dangerous to himself or to others, or may make any such order it deems fit, in the circumstances of the case, in the best interests of such person.


31. Inquiry by subordinate Court on commission issued by the Court of Protection and proceedings thereon.– (1) If the alleged mentally disordered person resides at a distance of more than fifty miles from the place where the Court is held to which the application is made, the said Court may issue a Commission to any subordinate court to make the inquiry, and such subordinate court shall thereupon conduct the inquiry in the manner hereinbefore provided.


(2)  On the completion of inquiry the subordinate court shall transmit the record of its proceedings with the opinion of the assessor, if any have been appointed, and its own opinion on the case; and the Court shall thereupon proceed to dispose of the application in the manner provided in sub-section (3) of section 30:


Provided that the Court may direct the subordinate court to make such further or other inquiry as it thinks fit before disposing of the application.


32. Appointment of guardian.– Where a mentally disordered person is incapable of taking care of himself, the Court may appoint any suitable person to be his guardian, or order him to be looked after in a psychiatric facility and order for his maintenance.


33. Management of property of mentally disordered person.– (1) Where the property of the mentally disordered person who is incapable of managing it, the Court shall appoint any suitable person to be the manager of such property.


(2)  No person, who is a legal heir of a mentally disordered person, shall be appointed under section 32 to be the guardian of such a person or the manager of his property, as the case may be, unless the Court for reasons to be recorded in writing considers that such appointment is for the benefit of the mentally disordered person.


(3)  The guardian of a mentally disordered person and the manager of his property appointed under this Ordinance shall be paid, from out of the property of the mentally disordered person, such allowance as the Court may determine.


34. Responsibility of manager.– A person appointed as a manager of the property of a, under this Ordinance, shall be responsible for the care, cost of treatment and maintenance of the mentally disordered person and of such member(s) of his family as are dependent on him.


35. Allowance payable to guardian.– The manager of the property of the patient shall pay to the guardian of the patient such allowances as may be fixed by the Court for the care and maintenance of the patient and of such members of his family as are dependent on him.


36. Powers of manager of property of mentally disordered person.– (1) Every manager appointed under this Ordinance shall, subject to the provisions of this Ordinance, exercise the same power in regard to the management of the property of the mentally disordered person in respect of which he is appointed as manager, as the mentally disordered person would have exercised as owner of the property, had he not been mentally disordered and shall realize all claims due to the estate of the mentally disordered person and pay all debts and discharge all liabilities legally due from that estate and in exercise of powers under this section regard shall be had first of all to the requirements of the mentally disordered person and the rights of the creditors, if any:-


Provided that no manager so appointed shall without the permission of the Court –


(a)     mortgage, create any charge on, or transfer by sale, gift, exchange or otherwise, any movable or immovable property of the mentally disordered person; or


(b)     lease out or give on bailment any such property.


(2)  The permission under proviso to sub-section (1) may be granted subject to such conditions or restrictions as the Court may think fit to impose.


(3)  The Court shall cause notice of every application for permission to be served on any relative or friend of the mentally disordered person and after considering objections, if any, received from the relatives or friends and after making such inquiries as it may deem necessary, grant or refuse permission having regards to the interest of the mentally disordered person.


37. Furnishing of inventory of immovable property, etc.– (1) Every manager appointed under this Ordinance shall, within a period of three months from the date of his appointment, deliver to the Court an inventory of the immovable property belonging to the mentally disordered person and of all assets and other movable property received on behalf of the mentally disordered person, together with a statement of all claims due on and all debts and liabilities due by such a person.


(2)  All transactions under this Ordinance shall be made through a bank authorized by the Court.


(3)  Every such manager shall also furnish to the Court within a period of three months of the closure of every financial year, an account of the property and assets in his charge, the sums received and disbursed on account of the mentally disordered person and the balance remaining with him.


(4)  If any relative of a mentally disordered person impugns, by a petition to the Court, the accuracy of the inventory or statement referred to in sub-section (1) or, as the case may be, any annual account referred to in sub-section (3), the Court may summon the manager and summarily inquire into the matter and make such order thereon as it thinks fit.


(5)  Any relative of a mentally disordered person may, with the leave of the Court, sue for an account from any manager appointed under this Ordinance or from any such person after his removal from office or trust, or from his legal representatives in the case of his death, in respect of any property then or formerly under his management or of any sums of money or other property received by him on account of such property.


38. Inquiry by Court of Protection in certain cases.– Where a mentally disordered person had, before the onset of his mental disorder, contracted to sell or otherwise disposed of his property or any portion thereof, the Court may, after conducting an inquiry, direct the manager appointed under this Ordinance to perform such contract and to do such other acts in fulfillment of the contract as the Court considers necessary and thereupon the manager shall be bound to act accordingly.


39. Disposal of business premises under the direction of Court of Protection.– Where a mentally disordered person had been engaged in business before he became mentally disordered, the Court may, if it appears to be in the best interest of such a person, after proper hearing notices have been issued to dependants, relatives for hearing to dispose of his business premises, direct the manager appointed under this Ordinance in relation to property of such person to sell and dispose of such premises and to apply the sale proceeds thereof in such manner as the Court may direct and thereupon the manager shall be bound to act accordingly.


40. Investment of assets of mentally disordered person.– All sums received by a manager on account of any estate in excess of what may be required for the current expenses of a mentally disordered person or for the management of his property, shall be paid into the public treasury on account of the estate, and shall be invested, from time to time, through state owned investment agencies, in the interest of the mentally disordered person.


41. Appointment of a new manager or guardian.– (1) The manager of the property of a mentally disordered person may resign with the permission of the Court, or for sufficient cause and for reasons to be recorded in writing, be removed by the Court and such Court may appoint a new manager in his place.


(2)  Any manager removed under sub-section (1) shall be bound to deliver the charge of all property of such a person to the new manager, and to account for all monies received or disbursed by him.


(3)  The guardian of the person of a mentally disordered person may resign with the permission of the Court, or for sufficient cause and for reasons to be recorded in writing, be removed by the Court and such Court may appoint a new guardian in his place.


42. Dissolution of partnership.– (1) Where a person, being a member of a partnership firm, is found to be mentally disordered, the Court may, on the application of any other partner, order for the dissolution of the partnership or on the application of any person who appears to that Court to be entitled to seek such dissolution dissolve the partnership in accordance with the provisions of the Partnership Act, 1932 (IX of 1932).


(2)  Upon dissolution a partnership firm to which sub-section (1) applies, the manager appointed under this Ordinance may, in the name and on behalf of the mentally disordered person, join with the other partners in disposing of the partnership property upon such terms, and shall do all such acts for carrying into effect the dissolution of the partnership as the Court may direct.


(3)  Notwithstanding anything detained in the foregoing provisions, the Court may, instead of appointing a manager of the estate, order that in the case of cash, or in the case of any other property, the produce thereof, shall be realized and paid or delivered to such person as may be appointed by the Court in this behalf, to be applied for the maintenance of the mentally disordered person and of such members of his family as are dependent on him.


43. Securities, etc., of mentally disordered person.– (1) Where any stock or Government securities or any share in a company are standing in the name of, or vested in, a mentally disordered person beneficially entitled thereto, or in the manager dies in the estate or himself becomes mentally disordered, or is out of the jurisdiction of the Court, or it is uncertain whether the manager is living or dead, or neglects or refuses to transfer the stock, securities or shares, or to receive and pay over thereof the dividends to a new manager appointed in his place, within fourteen days after being required by the Court to do so, then the Court may direct the company or [25][the Government] to make such transfer, or to transfer the same, and to receive and pay over the dividends in such manner as it may direct.


(2)  The Court may direct those dividends, the profit of shares, stock and Government securities shall be deposited in the mentally disordered person’s bank account.


(3)  Where any stock or Government securities or shares in a company is or are standing in the name of, or vested in, any person residing out of Pakistan, the Court upon being satisfied that such person has been declared to be mentally disordered and that his personal estate has been vested in a person appointed for the management thereof, according to the law of the place where he is residing may direct the company or [26][the Government] to make transfer of such stock, securities or shares or of any part thereof, to or into the name of the person so appointed or otherwise, and also to receive and pay over the dividends and proceeds, as the Court thinks fit.


44. Maintenance during temporary mental disorder.– If it appears to the Court that the mental illness of a mentally disordered person is in its nature temporary and that it is expedient to make provision for a temporary period, for his maintenance or for the maintenance of such members of his family as are dependent on him, the Court may direct his property or a sufficient part thereof to be applied for the purpose specified therein.


45. Inquiry by Court of Protection into cessation of mental disorder.– (1) Where the Court has reason to believe that any person who was found to be mentally disordered has ceased to be mentally disordered, it may direct any court subordinate to it to inquire whether such person has ceased to be mentally disordered.


(2)  An inquiry under sub-section (1) shall, so far as may be, be conducted under this Ordinance.


(3)  If after an inquiry under this section, it is found that the mental disorder of a person has ceased, the Court shall order all actions taken in respect of such person under this Ordinance to be set aside on such terms and conditions as that Court thinks fit to impose.


(4)  Without prejudice to the generality of the powers given above, the court shall have powers to make such orders and give such directions as the Court thinks fit, for the betterment of such a person.


46. Appeal to High Court.– An appeal shall lie to the High Court from an order made by a Court of Protection under this Chapter, within a period of sixty days from the date of order of the said Court.


CHAPTER VI


LIABILITY TO MEET COST OF MAINTENANCE OF MENTALLY DISORDERED PERSON ADMITTED IN A PSYCHIATRIC FACILITY


47. Liability to meet cost of maintenance of a patient admitted in a psychiatric facility.– (1) The cost of maintenance of a patient admitted in a Government owned psychiatric facility shall be borne by the Government:


Provided that–


(a)     the authority which made the order has not taken an undertaking from any person to bear the cost of maintenance of such a person; and


(b)     there is no provision for bearing the cost of maintenance of such person by the Court of Protection under this Ordinance.


(2)  Person holding public office or a public servant who is paid by the Government and is mentally disordered shall continue to receive benefit as per entitlement even after he retires voluntarily or on attainment of the age of superannuation or on the basis of medical invalidation.


(3)  In case of defence personnel, the paymaster of the military circle within which any psychiatric facility is situated shall pay to the officer in charge of such facility the cost of maintenance of such a mentally disordered person received and detained therein under this Ordinance.


(4)  Where any such person admitted in a psychiatric facility has an estate or where any person legally bound to maintain such person has the means to maintain such person, the Government or local authority liable to bear the cost of maintenance of such a person under any law, for the time being in force, may make an application to the Court within whose jurisdiction the estate of such a person is situated or the person legally bound to maintain the said person and having the means therefore resides, for an order authorizing it to apply his estate towards the cost of maintenance or directing the legally bound person to bear the cost of maintenance.


(5)  Nothing contained in the foregoing provisions shall be deemed to absolve a person legally bound to maintain a mentally disordered person from maintaining such a person.


48. Maintenance out of pay, pension, etc.– (1) Where any sum is payable in respect of pay, pension, gratuity or any allowance to any person by the Government and the person to whom the sum is payable if certified by a Magistrate under this Ordinance to be a mentally disordered person, the officer under whose authority such sum would be payable, may pay to the person having charge of the mentally disordered person so much of the said sum, as he thinks fit, having regard to the cost of maintenance of such person and may pay to such members of the family of the mentally disordered person as are dependent on him for maintenance, the surplus, if any, or such part thereof, as he thinks fit, having regard to the expenses of maintenance of such member.


(2)  Where there is any further surplus amount available out of the funds specified in sub-section (1) after making payments as provided in that subsection, the Government shall hold the same to be dealt with as follows, namely:-


(a)     where a mentally disordered person is certified to have ceased to be mentally disordered by the Court of Protection within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such person resides or is admitted, the whole of the surplus amount shall be paid back to that person;


(b)     where a mentally disordered person dies before payment, the whole of the surplus amount shall be paid over to those of his heirs who are legally entitled to receive the same; and


(c)     where a mentally disordered person dies during his mental disorder without leaving any person legally entitled to succeed to his estate, the whole of the surplus amount shall be paid into the State Treasury.


CHAPTER VII


PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF MENTALLY DISORDERED PERSONS


49. Cases of attempted suicide.– A person who attempts suicide shall be assessed by an approved psychiatrist and if found to be suffering from a mental disorder shall be treated appropriately under the provisions of this Ordinance.


50. Confidentiality.– No patient shall be publicized nor his identity disclosed to the public through press or media unless such person chooses to publicise his own condition.


51. Informed consent.– (1) Before commencing any investigation or treatment a psychiatrist or nominated medical officer shall obtain written informed consent, on a prescribed form, from the patient or if the patient is a minor, his nearest relative or a guardian, as the case may be.


(2)  Where the consent of a patient to any form of investigation(s) and or treatment(s) has been given the patient or if the patient is a minor, his nearest relative or a guardian, as the case may be, may withdraw his consent in writing at any time before the completion of the treatment.


(3)  Without prejudice to the application of sub-section (2) above to any treatment given under the plan of treatment to which a patient or if the patient is a minor, his nearest relative or a guardian, as the case may be, who has consented, to such a plan may, at any time withdraw his consent in writing to further treatment, or to further treatment of any description under the plan of treatment.


CHAPTER VIII


OFFENCES AND INDEMNITY


52. Penalty for making false statement, etc.– (1) Any person who willfully makes a false entry or statement in any application, recommendation, report, record or other document required or authorized to be made for any of the purposes of this Ordinance, with an intent to get someone to be detained for assessment or for treatment of mentally disordered; or with intent to deceive, makes use of any such entry or statement which he knows to be false, shall be guilty of an offence under this Ordinance.


(2)  Any person employed in a psychiatric facility, who strikes, ill-treats, maltreat or willfully neglects any patient confined in such psychiatric facility or willfully violates or neglects any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be guilty of an offence.


(3)  Any manager of estate of a patient who willfully neglects or refuses to deliver his accounts or any property in his possession within the time fixed by the Court shall be guilty of an offence.


(4)  Without prejudice to criminal prosecution under any other law for the time being in force, whoever is guilty of an offence under sub-section (1), (2) or (3), shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or with both.


(5)  Any person who carries out any form of inhumane treatment, on a mentally disordered person which includes: trepanning, branding, scalding, beating, exorcising, chaining to a tree etc. of any such person or subjecting a child to the cultural practice of rendering him mentally retarded, by inducing microcephaly, or subjecting any such person to physical, emotional or sexual abuse, shall be guilty of an offence, punishable with rigorous imprisonment which may extend to five years or with fine extending up to Rs.50,000 or with both.


(6)  Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of this Ordinance or of any rule or regulation made thereunder, for the contravention of which no penalty is expressly provided in this Ordinance, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees, or with both.


53. Indemnity.– (1) No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Ordinance or the rules made thereunder.


(2)  No suit or other legal proceedings shall lie against the Government for any damage caused or likely to be caused for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in pursuance of this Ordinance or the rules or orders made thereunder.


CHAPTER IX


INSPECTION OF MENTALLY DISORDERED PRISONERS


54. Inspection of mentally disordered prisoners.– (1) Where any person is detained under the provisions of section 466 or section 471 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898), section 130 of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 (XXXIX of 1952), section 143 of the Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953 (VI of 1953), or section 123 of the Pakistan Navy Ordinance, 1961 (XXXV of 1961), the Inspector-General of Prisons, if the accused person is detained in a jail, and the Board of Visitors or any two members of such Board, if the accused person is detained in a psychiatric facility, may visit him in order to ascertain his state of mind and such a detainee shall be visited once at least in every six months by the Inspector-General of Prisons or, as the case may be, the Board or any two members of such Board, shall make a report as to the state of mind of such person to the authority under whose order the accused person is detained and the Inspector-General of Prisons or, as the case may be, the Board of Visitors or any two members of such Board, shall make a report as to the state of mind of such person to the authority under whose order the accused person is detained.


(2)  The Government may empower the officer in charge of the jail in which such accused person is detained to discharge all or any of the functions of the Inspector General of Prisons under sub-section (1).


CHAPTER X


FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES


55. Forensic psychiatric services.– (1) Special security forensic psychiatric facilities shall be developed by the Government to house mentally disordered prisoners, mentally disordered offenders, as may be prescribed.


(2)  Admission, transfer or removal of patients concerned with criminal proceedings in such facilities shall be under the administrative control of the Inspector General of Prisons.


(3)  The Board of Visitors shall have an access to such persons admitted in forensic psychiatric facility in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.


CHAPTER XI


MISCELLANEOUS


56. Specialized Psychiatric Treatments.– (1) Specialized psychiatric treatment may be carried out with the informed consent of the patient, on the orders in writing by the psychiatrist in charge of the treatment of the patient or his relative or guardian, if the patient is a minor.


(2)  All electro-convulsive treatments shall preferably be administered under general anesthesia.


(3)  All electro-convulsive treatments shall be advised by a psychiatrist, in charge of the patient, recording the reasons for such advice and stating the reasons as to why the alternative available methods of treatment are not appropriate.


(4)  Administration of long acting anti-psychotic depot injections shall only be carried out upon the advice of a psychiatrist for a period as specified in the prescription and such cases shall be reviewed periodically.


(5)  No person shall advise and carry out psychosurgery or make any decision to carry out psychosurgery, except in cases where it is decided to be necessary and appropriate in a meeting in this regard, attended by a neurosurgeon, a neurophysician, a physician, two approved psychiatrists and a clinical psychologist.


57. Provisions for public and private sector psychiatric facilities.– The provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to all psychiatric facilities whether in public or private sector.


58. Removal of difficulties.– If any difficulty arises in giving effect to any of the provisions of this Ordinance, the [27][Government] may make such order, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, as may appear to [28][it] to be necessary for the purpose of removing the difficulty:


Provided that no such power shall be exercised after the expiry of two years from the coming into force of this Ordinance.


59. Power to make rules.– [29][(1)  The Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Ordinance.]


(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, the rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:-


(a)     to prescribe forms for any proceedings under this Ordinance;


(b)     to prescribe places of admission, places of safety and regulation of treatment of mentally disordered persons;


(c)     to regulate the admission, care and treatment of under trial persons or convicted prisoners;


(d)    to regulate the management of a mental health facility; and


(e)     to prescribe conditions subject to which a psychiatric facility may be licensed.


60. Ordinance to override.– The provisions of this Ordinance shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force.


61. Repeal and saving.– (1) The Lunacy Act, 1912 (IV of 1912), is hereby repealed.


(2)  Notwithstanding the repeal of Lunacy Act, 1912 (IV of 1912), hereinafter referred to as the repealed Act,–


(a)     all orders made, acts done and powers exercised under the repealed Act shall be deemed to have been validly made, done and exercised and deemed always to have had effect accordingly; and


(b)     nothing contained in this Ordinance shall be deemed to apply to proceedings, suits or appeals and applications pending under the repealed Act before any court immediately before the commencement of this Ordinance and such proceedings, suits, appeals and applications shall continue to be heard and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the repealed Act.


 



[1]Pursuant to the Proclamation of Emergency of the fourteenth day of October, 1999, and the Provisional Constitution Order No. 1 of 1999, read with the Provisional Constitution (Amendment) Order No. 9 of 1999, and in exercise of all powers enabling him in that behalf, the President of the Republic of Pakistan promulgate this Ordinance on 20 February 2001; and, was published in the Punjab Gazette (Extraordinary), Pt I, dated 20 February 2001, pages 115-48.


  This Ordinance was originally in the Federal ambit, however, the subject on which this law was enacted, devolved to the provinces by virtue of 18th Amendment in the Constitution, hence it was adopted, with amendments, for the province of the Punjab by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[2]Substituted for the words “Pakistan” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[3]Substituted for the words “Federal Mental Health Authority” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[4]Substituted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014) for the following:-


        “(f) “Government” means Government or, as the case may be, the Provincial Government;”.


[5]Substituted for the words “FEDERAL MENTAL HEALTH AUTHORITY” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[6]Substituted for the words “Federal Mental Health Authority” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[7]Substituted for the words “Federal Government” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[8]Substituted for the words “Federal Mental Health Authority” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[9]Substituted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014) for the following sub-section (2):-


“(2) The Authority shall consist of a Chairperson and not more than fourteen members to be appointed by the Federal Government.”


[10]Substituted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014) for the following sub-section (3):-


“(3) The members of the Authority shall be as follows:


(i)    Secretary, Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan;


(ii)   Director General, Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan;


(iii)  Provincial Health Secretaries;


(iv)  Advisor in Psychiatry, Medical Directorate, General Headquarters (GHQ); and


(v)   Seven eminent psychiatrists of at least ten years good standing.”


[11]Substituted for the words “Federal Government” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[12]Substituted for the words and commas “Secretary, Ministry of Health, Government of Pakistan” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[13]Substituted for the words “Federal Government” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[14]The word “concerned” omitted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[15]The words “at the provincial level” omitted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[16]The words “of the Province” omitted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[17]Substituted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014) for the following sub-section (1):-


“(1) The Federal Government may in any part of Pakistan, or the Provincial Government may within the limits of a Province, establish or maintain psychiatric facilities for the assessment, admission, treatment, rehabilitation, care and after care of mentally disordered patients at such places, as it deems fit.”


[18]Substituted for the words “the same Province or some other Province” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[19]Substituted for the words “Provincial Government with the consent of the other Provincial Government” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[20]Substituted for the words “Provincial Government concerned within which such order may be made” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[21]Substituted for the words “Provincial Government concerned” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[22]The word “Provincial” omitted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[23]The word “Provincial” omitted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[24]Substituted for the words “Advocate General of the Province concerned” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[25]Substituted for the words “government concerned” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[26]Substituted for the words “Government concerned” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[27]Substituted for the word “President” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[28]Substituted for the word “him” by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014).


[29]Substituted by the Punjab Mental Health (Amendment) Act 2014 (XI of 2014) for the following sub-section (1):-


“(1) The Federal Government may, in consultation with the Provincial Governments, by notification in the official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Ordinance.”Km

Opinion of the Investigating Officer

                               To Learn More,Click Here

2021 SCMR 612

                                                Opinion of  the investigating officer  –  

                                                                    not  admissible.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The  opinion  of  a  Police  Officer  who  has  investigated the  case  as  to  the  guilt  or  innocence  of  an  accused  person  is  not  a relevant  fact,  and  is  therefore  not  admissible,  under  the  Qanun-e Shadat  Order,  1984;  as  he  is  not  an  “expert”  within  the  meaning  of that  term  as  used  in  Article  59  of  the  Qanun-e-Shadat  Order, 1984.  Even  the  Criminal  Procedure  Code  (Cr.P.C)  does  not authorize  him  to  form  such  an  opinion.  To  determine  guilt  or innocence  of  an  accused  person  alleged  to  be  involved  in  the commission  of  an  offence  is  a  judicial  function  that  can  only  be performed  by  a  court  of  law.  

    This  judicial  function  cannot  be delegated  to  the  Police  Officer  investigating  the  case.  The  Police Officers  are  empowered  under  the  provisions  of  Chapter  XIV  of  the Cr.P.C,  only  to  investigate  the  non-cognizable  offence  with  the  order of  a  Magistrate  and  the  cognizable  offence  without  such  order.  This power  of  investigation,  in  no  way,  includes  the  power  to  determine guilt  or  innocence  of  the  accused  persons. 

     An  investigation,  as defined  in  Section  4(1)(l)  of  the  Cr.P.C,  includes  all  proceedings under the Cr.P.C for the collection of evidence conducted by a  Police Officer  or  by  any  other  person  authorized  by  a  Magistrate.  This definition  makes  it  clear  that  the  assignment  of  a  Police  Officer conducting  an  investigation  is  limited  to  the  collection  of  evidence, and  the  evidence  when  collected  has  to  be  placed  by  him  before  the competent  court  of  law.  Only  the  court  has  the  power  and  duty  to form  an  opinion  about  the  guilt  or  innocence  of  an  accused  person and  to  adjudicate  accordingly  on  the  basis  of  evidence  produced before  it.  

      An  opinion  formed  by  the  investigating  officer  as  to  the non-existence  or  existence  of  sufficient  evidence  or  reasonable ground  of  suspicion  to  justify  the  forwarding  of  an  accused  person to  a  Magistrate  under  sections  169  and  170  of  the  Cr.P.C  does  not tantamount  to  opinion  as  to  the  guilt  or  innocence  of  the  accused person.  And  despite  such  opinion  of  the  investigating  officer,  the final  determination  even  as  to  the  existence  or  non-existence  of sufficient  ground  for  further  proceeding  against  the  accused  person is to be made by the Magistrate under Section 173(3) and 204(1) of the Cr.P.C on examining the material available on record, and not on the basis of that opinion of the investigating officer.

Therefore, the reference to and reliance on the opinion of the investigating officer by the High Court in its judgment was also legally untenable.

Monday, September 27, 2021

SET-OFF...CPC

 

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN

                                   SET-OFF

                                          &

                            COUNTER-CLAIM

                         

INTRODUCTION .

CPC,1908 is simultaneously  substantive law creating  rights and obligations  and tells the procedure  how to  get them in pursuance of the LAW.Defendant is equiped with right to raise set off or couner claim in the suit brought by the plaintiff insead of filing a separate suit.

CPC.O.viii.r.6. 

     Ingredients of set-off  

 * suit must be for the recovery of money ,

* The defendant can claim set-off against the plaintiff's demand.

* Ascertained sum of money in set off.

* Legally recoverable by D from the plaintiff, 

* Not to exceed the pecuniary jurisdiction  of  the Court, 

* Both parties fill the same character as they fill in the plaintiff's suit,

* The defendant may raise set off at the first hearing of the suit, 

afterwards  permitted by the Court, 

* Present a written statement containing the particulars of set-off.

* The written statement shall have the same effect as a plaint. 

* Enable the Court to  a final judgement  of the original claim and of the set-off:

  * The rules of written statement apply to a reply  of set-off by the plaintiff .

 SET OFF DIFFERS FROM COUNTER-CLAIM-

         a. Both are cross-actions, 

         b.  a set–off is also a ground of defence. 

          c. It affords an answer to the plaintiffs’ claim either wholly or pro tanto, 

Set–off is a debt claimed by a defendant against the plaintiff balancing a debt claimed by the plaintiff against the defendant. 

A counter-claim

      a..a weapon of offence and 

      b...enables a defendant to enforce a claim against the plaintiff as effectually as in an independent action.

NATURE

* Both the set-off and counter-claim follow procedural nature.

 * way to short out the two claims in a single suit, 

*  gives a right to the defendant that instead of filing an independent action, he can seek that relief in a suit filed by the plaintiff against him.

* It is substantially a cross-action by the defendant against the plaintiff and entitles  the defendant full relief as in  a separate action at law.

* Set off  needs to be arising from the same action as filed by the plaintiff.

* The counterclaim is not confined to the claim made against the plaintiff.

 * Besides the plaintiff, other interested persons may be made be impleaded.

   * Set off does not permit  third party debt to set off against an un-related liability.

  *All forms of set-off require mutuality between claim and cross-claim.

   *There is no kinds of counter-claim.

   * Two Kinds of Set off.

      1-Legal set off .     

   .An ascertained sum of money which is legally recoverable from the plaintiff, is known as a legal set-off

    2-Equitable set off.

An unascertained sum of money is equitable set-off,may be claimed but not as of right.principle of equitable set-off is founded on the fundamental principles of equity, justice, and good conscience., None of the rules bar the defendant to claim equitable set-off.equitable set–off. The principle contained in Order 8 rule 6 applies not strictly but only by analogy.

The claim of the defendant’s inequitable set–off relates to transactions that can be suitably investigated in the suit itself, and then even if it is a claim for the unliquidated sum it should be taken up.It is ultimately one regarding the convenience and of the stratagem  of the litigation.

CONCLUSION-

 The terms of Set-off and counter-claim germinated in the CPC to make justice convenient for the judiciary and general people to save them from burden of fresh and separate suits.


Friday, September 24, 2021

CPC Amendment2018

         THE CODE OF CIVIL         PROCEDURE (PUNJAB AMENDMENT) ACT 2018


(Act XIV of 2018)


C O N T E N T S


 


SECTION                                HEADING


 


           1.      Short title and commencement.


           2.      Amendment in section 3 of Act V of 1908.


           3.      Omission of section 7 of Act V of 1908.


           4.      Amendment in section 9 of Act V of 1908.


           5.      Amendment in section 12 of Act V of 1908.


           6.      Amendment in section 24 of Act V of 1908.


           7.      Amendment in section 30 of Act V of 1908.


           8.      Substitution of section 33 of Act V of 1908.


           9.      Amendment in section 35 of Act V of 1908.


           10.    Amendment in section 35-A of Act V of 1908.


           11.    Substitution of section 44-A of Act V of 1908.


           12.    Amendment in section 91 of Act V of 1908.


           13.    Amendment in section 92 of Act V of 1908.


           14.    Substitution of section 95 of Act V of 1908.


           15.    Amendment in section 97 of Act V of 1908.


           16.    Substitution of section 102 of Act V of 1908.


           17.    Amendment in section 104 of Act V of 1908.


           18.    Amendment in section 114 of Act V of 1908.


           19.    Amendment in section 115 of Act V of 1908.


           20.    Amendment in section 151 of Act V of 1908.


 



[1]THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (PUNJAB AMENDMENT) ACT 2018


(Act XIV of 2018)


[20 March 2018]


 


An Act further to amend the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.


It is necessary further to amend the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908) for purposes of updating certain provisions of the Code.


Be it enacted by Provincial Assembly of the Punjab as follows:


1.   Short title and commencement.- (1) This Act may be cited as the Code of Civil Procedure (Punjab Amendment) Act 2018.


(2)        It shall come into force at once.


 


2.   Amendment in section 3 of Act V of 1908.- In the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), for brevity referred to as the Act, in section 3, for the words “Court of Small Causes”, the words “Court of Small Claims and Minor Offences” shall be substituted.


 


3.   Omission of section 7 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, section 7 shall be omitted.


 


4.   Amendment in section 9 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 9, after the words “impliedly barred”, the words “or for which a general or a special law is in force” shall be inserted.


 


5.   Amendment in section 12 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 12, after subsection (2), the following new subsection (3) shall be inserted:


“(3)      For purposes of the disposal of an application under subsection (2), the Court may, in the interest of expeditious disposal, apply such fair procedure as the circumstances of the case warrant, and shall, unless, for reasons to be recorded it directs otherwise, order any fact to be proved or disproved by affidavit.”.


 


6.   Amendment in section 24 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 24, subsection (4) shall be omitted.


 


7.   Amendment in section 30 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 30, for clause (c), the following shall be substituted:


“(c)      order any fact to be proved or disproved by affidavit.”.


 


8.   Substitution of section 33 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, for section 33, the following shall be substituted:


“33. Judgment and decree.- The Court, after the case has been heard, shall pronounce judgment maximum within fifteen days and on such judgment a decree shall follow simultaneously.”.


 


9.   Amendment in section 35 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 35, for subsection (1), the following shall be substituted:


“(1)      Subject to such conditions and limitations, as may be prescribed, and to the provisions of law for the time being in force, the costs of an incident to all suits and other proceedings in the suit including execution proceedings, shall follow the event, and the Court shall have full power to determine by whom or out of which property and to what extent such costs are to be paid, and to give all necessary directions for the purpose aforesaid.


(1a)      The fact that the Court has no jurisdiction to try the suit shall be no bar to exercising the powers under subsection (1).”.


 


10. Amendment in section 35-A of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 35-A, in subsection (2):


(a)        for the words “twenty five thousand”, the words “one hundred thousand” shall be substituted;


(b)  first proviso shall be omitted; and


(c)        in the second proviso, the expression “, further,” shall be omitted.


 


11. Substitution of section 44-A of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 44-A, the following shall be substituted:


“44-A. Execution of decrees passed by Courts in the reciprocating territory.- (1) Where a certified copy of a decree of any of the Superior Courts of the reciprocating territory has been filed in a District Court, the decree may be executed in Pakistan as if it had been passed by the District Court.


(2)  Together with the certified copy of the decree shall be filed a certificate from such superior Court stating the extent, if any, to which the decree has been satisfied or adjusted and such certificate shall, for the purposes of proceedings under this section, be conclusive proof of the extent of such satisfaction or adjustment.


(3)  The provisions of section 47 shall as from the filing of the certified copy of the decree apply to the proceedings of a District Court executing a decree under this section, and the District Court shall refuse execution of any such decree, if it is shown to the satisfaction of the Court that the decree falls within any of the exceptions specified in clauses (a) to (f) of section 13.


 


Explanation 1. “Reciprocating territory” means such country or territory as the Federal Government may, from time to time, by notification in the official Gazette, declare to be reciprocating territory for the purposes of this section; and “superior Courts”, with reference to any such territory, means such Courts as may be specified in the said notification.


Explanation 2. “Decree”, with reference to a superior Court, means any decree or judgment of such Court under which a sum of money is payable, not being a sum payable in respect of taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty, and does not include an arbitration award, even if such award is enforceable as a decree or judgment.”.


 


12.       Amendment in section 91 of Act V of 1908.- (1) In the Act, in section 91, in subsection (1), for the expression “having obtained the consent in writing of the Advocate General”, the expression “with the leave of the Court” shall be substituted.


 


13.       Amendment in section 92 of Act V of 1908.- (1) In the Act, in section 92:


(a)        in subsection (1), for the expression “and having obtained the consent in writing of the Advocate General”, the expression “with the leave of the Court” shall be substituted; and


(b) for subsection (2), the following shall be substituted:


“(2)      No suit claiming any of the reliefs specified in subsection (1) shall be instituted in respect of any such trust as is therein referred to, except in conformity with the provisions of that subsection.”.


 


14. Substitution of section 95 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, for section 95, the following shall be substituted:


“95.     Compensation for obtaining arrest, attachment or injunction on insufficient grounds.- (1) Where, in any suit in which an arrest or attachment has been effected or a temporary injunction is granted under the last preceding section, it appears to the Court that:


(a)        such arrest, attachment or injunction was applied for insufficient grounds; or


(b)        there was no reasonable or probable ground for making the application -


the Court may, on its own motion or on the application of the aggrieved party, award such punitive compensation as it deems reasonable to the aggrieved party for the expense and injury caused to him.


(2)  In addition to the compensation awardable under subsection (1), the Court may also make an order directing the party at fault to deposit such amount in the public exchequer as the Court deems just, as penalty for abusing the process of the law and wasting the time of the Court.


(3)  An order under this section shall bar any suit for compensation in respect of such arrest, attachment or injunction.”.


 


15. Amendment in section 97 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 97, the words “passed after the commencement of this Code” shall be omitted.


 


16. Substitution of section 102 of Act V of 1908.-  In the Act, for section 102, the following shall be substituted:


“102.   No second appeal in certain cases.- No second appeal shall lie in any suit when the amount or value of the subject matter of the original suit does not exceed rupees twenty five million.”.


 


17.       Amendment in section 104 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 104, after clause (ff), the following new clause (fff) shall be inserted:


“(fff)   an order under section 91 or section 92 refusing leave to institute a suit;”.


 


18. Amendment in section 114 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 114, for subsection (1), the following shall be substituted:


“(1)      Subject as aforesaid, any person considering himself aggrieved­:


(a)        by a decree or order from which an appeal is allowed by this Code but from which no appeal has been preferred; or


(b)        by a decree or order from which no appeal is allowed by this Code -


may apply for a review of judgment to the Court which passed the decree or made the order, and the Court may make such order thereon as it thinks fit.”.


 


19. Amendment in section 115 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 115:


(a)        in subsection (1), for the second proviso, the following shall be substituted:


“Provided further that the subordinate court shall provide copies of the documents to a person within three days of the decision, and the High Court shall dispose of such application within six months,”; and


(b)        after subsection (4), the following new subsection (5) shall be inserted:


“(5)      No proceedings in revision shall be entertained by the High Court against an order passed by the District Court under section 104.”.


 


20. Amendment in section 151 of Act V of 1908.- In the Act, in section 151, after the word “Court” occurring for the first time, the expression “, to be exercised after recording reasons in writing,” shall be inserted.


 



[1]This Act, which amended the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908); was passed by the Punjab Assembly on 14 March 2018; assented to by the Governor of the Punjab on 19 March 2018; and, was published in the Punjab Gazette (Extraordinary), dated 20 March 2018, pages 6695-98.

Wednesday, September 15, 2021

Khasra Girdawari

            Khasra Girdawari.

           





               خسرہ گرداوری

The Patwari make enteries in the Khasra Girdawari:-

the name of owner,

 cultivator, 

land/khasra number, 

area, kind of land, 

cultivated and non cultivated area, 

source of irrigation,

 name of crop and its conditions, 

revenue and rate of revenue, minimum twice in a year.

Q....If possession is changed then how it is mentioned in the khasra girdawari?

   It can be done either If the previous owner and new cultivator agree or also if there is any court order for the same.

Q......What is Khewat/account?

   It is also called as revenue record/jamabandi number and it is ownership number.

Q......What is sub account/.khatoni?

The sub account number is a number , given to the cultivators.


Q......Which is Banjer Jadid Land?

Cultivated land which is not continuously cultivated for four cropings is called Banzer Jadid Land.

Q.What is Banjer Kadeem land ?

The cultivated land which is not cultivated or cropping continuously upto 8 croppings is called Banjer Kadeem land.

Q....What is Uncultivated land?

The non cultivated land such as mountains/Maruthal/sandy land/house, canal, or choe etc.etc. are called uncultivated land.

Q....Where there is exemption in revenue for a field, how it is shown in Khasra Girdawari?

   There is crossed circle with red ink around the land numbers under exemption from revenue.

Q.....Whether any Permanent survey demarcation given any number of cultivation in the girdawari?

     No, it is mentioned with red ink without giving any number.

Q.......What is spoil?

When a crop spoils due to natural disaster then the same is called Spoil/loss.

Q......How does the patwari write a Colour/Thur sem land in the khasra girdawari?                  

 Patwari writes down with (Vacant ( word in the khasra girdawari by writing ‘Thur cause’ or Colour cause’.

Q......If there is no change in the cultivator then how does the patwari mention it in the khasra girdawari?

     If there is no change in cultivator then in the column of cultivation , during rainy giridawari, patwari marks a cross a line on the left hand side from upper corner to right hand below corner and like this in rainy girdawari, from upper right hand corner to left right hand below corner.

Q......Under what circumstances the patwari can change the entries of khasra girdawari?

       The patwari can change the entries only if both the concerned parties are agreed or if any such decision is given by any appropriate authority or court.

Q.......Whether the patwari can change the entries of girdawari on the basis of sanctioned mutations?

      If through any mutation, if the change in possession is accepted then by giving the reference of this mutation, at the time of inspection of next cropping the girdawari can be changed.

Q...Can the patwari make corrections in the book entries of the khasra girdawari?

If the patwari has to make corrections in the book entries of khasra girdawari then first of all he will enter the report in the register and then will make corrections with red ink in the register and then get the same scrutinize from the area kanoongo.

Q....The year, when a revenue record is to be prepared, what should be take in mind by claimants regarding girdawari?

     As there is entry of last cropping of rainy in the record hence the owners must get satisfaction about the entries of rainy cropping and the patwari must prepare the girdawari carefully by presenting on the spot.

Q......How is the possession of uncultivated given and how is it entered in the girdawari?

   As per the orders of court, the possession of the uncultivated land is given to the degree holder by verifying the fact that entire area aroundand the description of khasra girdawari is made in the khasra girdawari regarding ownership and revenue.

Q......What procedure is followed while giving possession as per court orders?

     The degree holder, By getting Execution from the executing court, warrants are  issued by the court.The concerned revenue officer will execute the warrant and send report to the court.

The area patwari enters the proceedings of giving possession in the register as it is and after possession .The warrants after implementation are sent to the concerned court through the higher revenue officers.

Q.....If there is crop on the spot then what should be do more while proceedings of possession?

      In this regard, the area kanoongo implements the order of court.If the court has not clearly given any order then get the information about it from the court. Either the court sends orders to take possession after cutting of cropping or to settle the compensation of cropping and asks the degree holder to deposit the same in the court and orders for possession with cropping.

 Q....When girdawri is made and it's procedure ?

Girdawari , is generally done twice a year, the detail of which is as under :

√ Winter/rabi -             1 March to 31 March

√ Rainy /Haari. kharif- 1 October to 31 

Except of above, twice in a year, the additional winter and additional rainy girdawari is made as under :

Additional Rabi 1 May to 15 May

Additional rainy 16 Nov. to 30 Nov.

As per the Punjab Land record manual‘s para 9.9, before starting the girdawari, it the  duty of the patwari to give information of Girdawari to the sarpanch and Numberdar of village by which it maybe known that in that particular village what is the date on which the Girdawari will be done

Also while doing girdawari, the patwari is supposed to take along the Numberdar, sarpanch, members panchayat or other prominent persons in the field and get their signatures in the entry document.

Before starting the Girdawari, it is to be ensured that proper announcements for the same are made in the concerned village through the village chowkidar but now it is in the books only.

The land owners and cultivators should give full cooperation to the patwari while girdawari of their field is done.

As per this para, the patwari has no right to make changes in the girdawari. The patwari can only change the name of one person to another in the girdawari only when both the parties are agreed and may put signatures in front of the report in daily dairy otherwise the patwari can make changes only when gets orders from higher officers/courts or orders from the area revenue officers for implementation. It is the duty of the patwari that the mutations accepted by area revenue officers, must be referred in front of land numbers of the concerned owners.

When there is requirement of correction in the possession of Khasra Girdawari then the concerned person can give application to the area officer for correction by affixing the court fee stamp ., and the page of girdawari must be enclosed with it. As per the decision given by the area revenue officer the correction in the record is made by the patwari.

Q...What are  Duties of patwari or public at the time of any Natural disaster(Regarding special girdawari)

When there are natural disasters (floods, heavy rain or drought etc.) which further effects the croppings or animals.Such kind of losses are settled as per the below special girdawaris and adverse to it, if there is no instruction of government the losses of croppings are given as Govt likes.

Monday, September 13, 2021

RULINGS OF SRA 1877







Case Laws of Specific Relief Act.

       SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT I OF 1877

Section 8

*  Partition---Possession, recovery of---Proof---Land in question was jointly owned by both the parties and plaintiffs sought recovery of possession on the basis of partition of land between them---Judgment and decree passed by Trial Court was set aside by Lower Appellate Court and the suit was decreed in favour of plaintiffs---Validity---Plaintiffs during evidence neither exhibited the order of partition nor copy of Roznamcha Waqiati showing delivery of possession to their predecessor-in-interest nor “Tatimma” made in favour of plaintiffs as a result of partition was produced---Plaintiffs relied more on “Naqsha Jeem” but such docu8ment was not signed by revenue officer or any other competent authority---Entries on the mutation were also not countersigned by competent authority---Mere entry in Register of Mutations did not have any sanctity in the eye of law---Plaintiffs failed to prove that suit-land was partitioned and possession of land was handed over to predecessor-in-interest of Plaintiffs---Judgment and decree passed by Lower Appellate court was set aside and that of the Trial Court was restored---Revision was allowed in circumstances.    

Shahnaz Akhtar and others    Versus    Riaz Hussain and others.

2012 C L C 366


Section 9

*   Suit for possession---Prerequisites stated.

    While deciding the suit under section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, the following prerequisites must be followed for arriving at lawful conclusion:

(i)    That the person suing must have been dispossessed;

(ii)    That such dispossession must be of immovable property;

(iii)    That such dispossession should be without consent and should be otherwise than in due course of law and

(iv)    That the suit is to be brought within the period of six months from the date of dispossession.

Zahir Hussain and 4 others    Versus      Bashir Muhammad and 5 others.

2012 C L C 377


SECTION 12 AND Sec 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, of Contract Act.

     No partial specific performance of conteact unless share of vendee, preoportion of price paid was mentioned in agreement in question.

1995 CLC 1751 LAH


SECTION 12(c) ,21(a) -19,22.

-Agreement providing adequate compensation in terms of money in case of non performance-specific performance shall not be granted.

PLD 1958 P.C 150

AIR 1929 P.C 190

1989 ALD 501

1989 CLC 916

specific relief act (India) by Annad & Ayyer 9th edition at page 660-661.

Three situations

1 penalty clause as a bond –for performance.

2 liquidated damager as compensation.

3 sums named is good substitution.

AGAINTS

Existence of penalty clause –no bar to specific performance.

PLD 1952 PESH 32

1989 ALD 445

1990 ALD 776

1090 MLD 712

PLD 1991 S.C. 905

1991 CLC note 255 at p.198


SECTION 12 & 22

-Inadequacy of price no ground to refuse specific performance.

PLD 1994 SC 326

REL PLD 1981 KAR 170


SECTION 15

-Vendor contracting on his behalf and on behalf of  some body else and the contact unenforceable in law to the extent of such some body’s share. Sec 15 held attracted and plaintiff could not cucceed unless he relinquished all claim to further performance and all right to compensation.

AIR 1925 LAH 465

AIR 1926 LAH 136 (DB) (MINER’S SHARES RELINQUISHED)

AIR 1930 LAH 34

AIR 1930 CAL 457

AIR 1932 P.C. 43

AIR 1943 Nagpur 313

1979 CLC 499

AIR 1037 MAD 596


SECTION 12

-Transaction proved to be for benefit of vendors including minors whose interest was safeguard and taken into consideration in sale transaction- suit rightly decreed by three courts.

1995 SCMR 982


-inadequacy of price no grant for refusing specific performance.

1995 CLC 1705


Sc.12, 27(b), 42, 54 of Specific Relief Act.

Sec. 41, proviso – Transfer of Property Act.

      Equitable doctrine of proviso to S. 41 which protected a subsequent transferee, it is upon subsequent transferor to establish that he had acted in good faith and had taken reasonable care such as checking with the Sub-Registrar etc. before entering into transaction and that he had given valuable consideration for such transfer. Such equitable doctrine was a deduction from the law of estoppel which must be pleaded clearly with specific facts. Burden of proof is always on the person who pleaded such protection.

Mst. Rubina Badar        Vs.    M/S Long Life Builders.

2012 SCMR 84

Rel: 2002 SCMR 2003


SECTION 29(b)

-subsequent purchase during pendency of suit steps into the shoed of alienor (original defendant) –agreement of sale in favour of plaintiff executed by ailerons could be specifically enforced as against subsequent purchase in terms of sec 29(b).

PLD 1995 LAH 255

 


SECTION 34 & 42 OF SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT(ARBITRATION ACT 1940)


-    Admittedly there being an arbitration agreement, defendant could not invoke Section-34 without resorting to arbitration procedure – Arbitration clause was an independent agreement between the parties which could be invoked, if a dispute or difference had arisen between the parties, therefore, termination of agreement would not supersede it…

Irrespective of non0existence of agreement, the arbitration clause survived and arbitrator had the power to resolve the dispute.

Mobilink  v.  Niamatullah Achakzai

2012 CLC 12 (Bloc) (DB)


SECTION 42+39

-Void transaction would create no legal effect.

PLD 1995 LAH 313


Sect. 42

         Suit for declaration. One can file suit in respect of his own title to such legal character or right to property. Sect. 42 does not apply to a case where plaintiffs do not allege their entitlement to any legal character or right or its denial by defendants. But where right to his own legal character or property is not involved, such suit is not maintainable.

    Plaintiff did not approach the Court for declaration of his own right but challenged the defendants pretention. Suit was barred by Sect. 42.

Ilyas Ahmad        Vs.    Muhammad Munir.

PLD 2012 Sindh 92


Sect. 42

      Thumb impression on Sale Deed having been admitted, suit for declaration was not competent. However, suit for cancellation of sale deed was required to be filed.

Abul Rehman     Vs.    Mst. Karam Mai.

2012 CLC 238 Lah.


STAMP ACT

SECTION 35

-Instrument not properly stamped not invalid but subject to disabilities –can be admitted in evidence on payment of deficit.

PLD 1989 KAR 371

 

Sunday, September 12, 2021

Doctrine of Estoppel

Doctrine of Estoppel prohibits,
 a person from going back stated earlier  in a Court of Law.

                    Basis:-

                       Equity..... Good faith. 

                 Object:-   1.To prevent Fraud. 

                                    2.To promote Honesty. 

           

                                   Art.114..

                              * If one person 

                                                  * by his declaration, 

                                                                              *act or omission,

                                      *intentionally 

                                                     *caused or permitted

                       *another person

                                                   *to believe a thing/ Fact, 

                                                                                      * to be true 

                     * for acting upon such Belief,

                    √• He / His representative can't deny the truth of that thing

                               * in any suit or proceeding inter se. 

                            "Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcxx

                     Illustration. 

A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby 

induces B to buy and pay for it. 

The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the 

ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. He must not be allowed to prove his 

want of title. 


           Art.115.     Estoppel of tenant and of licensee of person in possession:

                 Applies to:-

                      1- Tenant & Landlord. 

                     2.Licensee. 

                     3.Mortgagee. 

                     4.Fiduciary relationship Capacity. 

                             No Tenant of 

                  1-immovable property,

                 2-   or person claiming through such tenant,shall,

                 3- during the continuance of the tenancy,

                 4- Is permitted to deny the title of the landlord;

           Licensee of:-

                   1.   √ Immovable property 

                   2.  √ Is not Permitted to deny, 

                  3.  √The title of Licensor's possession. 

                               Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

                 Art.116. 

                             Estoppel of acceptor of bill of exchange bailee or licensee:

              1- No acceptor of a bill of exchange ,

              2-shall be permitted to deny the authority of drawer,

              3-To endorse it; 

              4-No Bailee or licensee is permitted to deny  his bailor's or licenser's authority. 


         Explanation 1: The acceptor of a bill of exchange may deny that the bill was really drawn 

                                  by the person by whom it purports to have been drawn. 

          Explanation 2: If a bailee delivers the goods bailed to a person other than the bailor, he 

                                    may prove that such person had a right to them as against the bailor.

                                                Xxxcccccccc

                       Bailor..... Bailee.... Baliment... 

                          Defined. 

                                 1-  A bailment is , 

                                         A) a delivery of personal property by one person to another ,

                                        B) for a specific purpose & understanding to be returned attaining the object. 

                                 2-A bailor is the person who delivers the property. 

                                 3-A bailee is the person who receives it.

                 Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

                                        What Is Bill of Exchange?

                                              A bill of exchange:-

                                                                  1.√ is a written order, 

                                                                 2* used primarily in international trade, 

                                                                3* Binds one party to pay to another party,

                                                               4* Amount must be fixed one. 

                                                               5* on demand or at a predetermined date.

                                                              6* Bills of exchange are  as of checks and promissory notes.

                                                             7* They can be drawn by :-

                                                                                                    •  Individuals or

                                                                                                   •  Banks, 

                                                                                                   •  Generally transferable by endorsements.

                                                                    Xxxxxxxxxxxxx

                   Principles of Estoppel

               The representation is an essential element of estoppel & it must be :-

      1-By one person to another person.

      2- As to facts and not of law.

     3-As to an existing fact.

     4-It makes the other person believe the Fact is true.

     5-Pursuation to act upon the Fact.

    6-Other person suffered a loss by such representation. 

   7-Other person is unaware of the actual situation. 

   8- It must be intentional. 

   9- No Estoppel if fact (s)  is known the parties. 

  10-No Representation- No Estoppel. 

                   Types of Estoppel 

                            1-Estoppel of Record or Quasi-record. (S.11CPC) 

   This doctrine prohibits the parties to a case from instituting another suit in the same matter or the facts already decided by the court. 

√ Estoppel by Deed

      Bilateral agreement executing a deed as to certain facts is binding upon the executent and his legal representatives. 

       * Estoppel by Pais or Estoppel by Conduct

       * Estoppel by Pias’ is ‘Estoppel in the Country’ or ‘Estoppel before the public’.

      * Estoppel by conduct means when a person through ,

    *agreement,

   *misrepresentation or

  *negligence 

 *makes the other person believe in certain Facts. 

* Other person had taken some action in any mode,

 *The first person cannot deny the veracity of the statements given by him earlier. 


 *Doctrine of estoppel by Election. 

  The person receiving the gift or claiming the right can enjoy one of them and not both of them. 

 * Equitable Estoppel

A person can't bring legal action in conflicting with his statements, claims or acts earlier. 

* Estoppel by negligence. 

Ground of negligence is included in the plea of estoppel as, the party owned a duty towards the general public or anyone else towards whom he has acted negligently through words or conduct. Such estoppel is based on the existence of a duty which the person estopped is owing to the person led into the wrong belief or to the general public of whom the person is one.

* Estoppel by Benami Transaction.

If the owner of property clothes a third person with the apparent ownership and a right of disposition thereof, not merely by transferring it to him, but also by acknowledging that the transferee has paid him the consideration for it, he is estopped from asserting his title as against a person to whom such third party has disposed of the property and who has taken it in good faith and for value. (Li Tse Shi v Pong Tse Ching, (A.I.R. 1935 P.C. 208)

* Estoppel on a Point of law. 

The principle of estoppel cannot be invoked to defeat the plain provisions or a statute. There is no estoppel against an Act of Legislature.The Doctrine of estoppel does not apply to statutes but only to the facts. 

* Equitable Estoppel:

     Art.115 only deals with the estoppel that arises against a tenant or licensee, a similar estoppel has been held to arise against a mortgagee, an executor, a legatee, a trustee, or an assignee of property, precluding him from denying the title of the mortgagor, the testator, the author of the trust, or the assignor, as the case may be.

* Proprietary Estoppel.

We often see promises being made and later broken. While in some cases we can do nothing about it, but in certain circumstances, particularly in matters related to land or property, there is a possibility to bring a claim to enforce a broken promise. This is called proprietary estoppel. 

* Estoppel by Convention.

The parties to an agreement could not deny to the assumed facts, because if the party or parties are allowed to go back on their assumptions, it would be unfair and lead to injustice. 

* Estoppel by Acquiescence.

When one party served a legal notice upon other party nexus with the facts of a claim, and the other party fails to acknowledge or refute it.The other party is said to have accepted the claim and has acquiesced it.

Collateral Estoppel. 

The doctrine is to prevent a party from re-litigating either a prior issue (collateral estoppel) or claim (res judicata).

* Contractual Estoppel.

The parties signing the contract agreed to the fact that in case of any dispute between them, the case would be filed in the court of in Lahore. Once agreed the parties cannot, later on, assert to change the jurisdiction in the particular case. They are bound by the principle of contractual estoppel. 

Issue Estoppel. 

•√ Issue estoppel is a sub-species of the res judicata doctrine. 

Issue estoppel arises :-

* where an issue(s) germinating the cause of action  litigated and decided in the first Lis. 

*  In the subsequent proceedings inter se the same parties having a different cause of action but the same issue is relevant. 

* One of the parties intends to reopen the decided issue(s).

* Buurden of Proof. 

BOP is on the party claiming estoppel. 

Exceptions. 

1.jurisdiction of courts.  2.Minors. 

3.Silence.                         4.criminal case. 

5.Expert opinion. 

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz  Continued,,,,,,...

Saturday, September 4, 2021

Urban Partition Act 2012

THE PUNJAB PARTITION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY ACT 2012
 (Act IV of 2013)







C O N T E N T S

SECTION                                HEADING

      1.           Short title, extent and commencement.

   2.           Limitation on scope.

 3.           Definitions. 

     4.           Suit for partition of immovable property. 

      5.           Appearance of defendants and consequence of non-appearance.       6.           Written statement.

  7.           Mesne profits pending adjudication. 

  8.           Question of title or share.

  9.           Appointment of referee for partition.

10.          Internal auction.

  11.          Open auction.

  12.          Mesne profits.

 13.          Private settlement.

  14.          Time limit for disposal of the suit.

 15.          Application of Act V of 1908.

 16.          Instructions of High Court.

 17.          Repeal.


 [1]THE PUNJAB PARTITION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY ACT 2012


(Act IV of 2013)


[5 January 2013]


 


An Act to amend and reform the law relating to


partition of immovable property.


 


Preamble.– Whereas it is expedient to amend and reform the law relating to expeditious partition of immovable property and to provide for ancillary matters;


      It is enacted as follows:-


 


1.   Short title, extent and commencement.– (1) This Act may be cited as the Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012.


      (2)  It shall extend to whole of the Punjab.


      (3)  It shall come into force at once.


 


2.   Limitation on scope.– Nothing contained in this Act shall be deemed to affect any law providing for the partition of agricultural land or land subservient to agriculture.


 


3.   Definitions.– (1) In this Act–


       (a)  “Code” means the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908);


       (b)  “Court” means the Court of original civil jurisdiction competent to entertain and decide suits for partition of immovable property;


       (c)  “immovable property” means an immovable property, other than agricultural land or land subservient to agriculture, jointly owned by two or more persons;


       (d)  “internal auction” means the auction of the immovable property amongst the co-owners of the property in which at least two co-owners are eligible to participate; and


       (e)  “mesne profits” means the approximate rental benefit which the co-owner in possession of the immovable property gains to the exclusion of any other co-owner during the pendency of the suit under the Act.


      (2)  An expression used in the Act but not defined shall mean the same as in the Code.


4.   Suit for partition of immovable property.– An owner of immovable property may file a suit for partition of the property, giving details of the property, citing all other co-owners as defendants and attaching all the relevant documents in his reach or possession.


 


5.   Appearance of defendants and consequence of non-appearance.– (1) The Court shall issue notice to the defendants for appearance on a date, not later than ten days, through the process serving agency and registered post or courier service and, where possible, also through electronic and telecommunication means.


      (2)  Copies of the plaint and the documents annexed with the plaint shall be attached with the notice under subsection (1) served through the process serving agency and sent by registered post or courier.


      (3)  If a defendant fails to appear and the Court is satisfied that the notice has not been served on the defendant or the defendant is willfully avoiding the service of the notice, the Court may direct service of the notice by–


             (i)   affixing a copy of the notice at some conspicuous part of the residence of the defendant; or


             (ii)   publication in the press, electronic media or any other mode.


      (4)  If the defendant fails to appear on the date fixed and the Court is satisfied that the notice had been duly served, it may proceed ex-parte against such defendant.


      (5)  If an ex-parte order is passed against a defendant, he may, within fifteen days from the date of knowledge, apply to the Court for setting aside the ex-parte order and shall submit along with the application the written statement and attach with such written statement copies of all the relevant documents in his reach or possession.


      (6)  If the defendant submits the written statement and shows sufficient cause for his non appearance, the Court may set aside the ex-parte order on such terms as it may deem fit.


 


6.   Written statement.– (1) Subject to section 5, a defendant in a suit for partition of immovable property shall file the written statement within thirty days of his first appearance in the Court and shall attach with the written statement copies of all the relevant documents in his reach or possession.


      (2)  If a defendant fails to file the written statement within the period mentioned in subsection (1), the Court shall strike off his defence and in that event he shall not be entitled to lead any evidence.


 


7.   Mesne profits pending adjudication.– (1) On the first date of hearing or as soon as thereafter, the Court may, pending adjudication of the suit, direct the co-owner, in possession of the immovable property, to deposit, either on monthly or quarterly basis, such interim mesne profits in the Court as it may determine on account of share of a co-owner not in possession of the property.


      (2)  If an order under subsection (1) is passed, the co-owner in possession of the property shall deposit the amount on or before the date fixed by the Court and, in the absence of any such order, on or before 15th of the month or the first month of the quarter for which the amount is due.


      (3)  If the co-owner fails to deposit the amount under this section within the time specified under subsection (2), the Court shall–


             (a)  in case he is plaintiff, dismiss his suit; and


             (b)  in case he is defendant, strike off his defence and in that event, he shall not be entitled to lead any evidence.


 


8.   Question of title or share.– (1) When there is a dispute as to the title or share in the immovable property, the Court shall decide such question before proceeding further in the suit under this Act.


      (2)  The determination of a question of title or share of the immovable property by the Court under subsection (1) shall be deemed to be a decree in terms of the Code.


 


9.   Appointment of referee for partition.– (1) If all the co-owners agree in writing on partition of the immovable property through appointment of a referee, the Court shall appoint a referee for partition of the property within such specified or extended time as the Court deems appropriate.


      (2)  Subject to the restrictions imposed under any law governing town planning, the referee shall decide whether the immovable property is partible and if so, the referee shall propose partition of the immovable property.


      (3)  [2][* * * * * * *]


      (4)  The referee may, with the written consent of two or more co-owners of the immovable property, combine the shares of such co-owners in the proposal of partition.


      (5)  The Court shall affirm the proposal of the referee for partition of the immovable property through decree unless the Court is satisfied that the proposal is in contravention of any law.


      (6)  The Court may fix the fee of the referee to be paid by the co-owners according to their respective shares in the immovable property.


 


10.    Internal auction.– (1) If on the date fixed by the Court for the purpose, the co-owners fail to submit written agreement about the partition of the immovable property through appointment of a referee or the referee is of opinion that the property is not partible or the Court finds that the proposal of the referee is in contravention of any law, the Court shall determine the reserve price of the immovable property and direct sale of the property through internal auction on the next date of hearing.


         (2)  The Court shall require the co-owners to be present in person or through their authorized agents on the date of internal auction.


         (3)  The internal auction shall be conducted in the Court and the Court shall maintain record of internal auction which shall form part of the suit.


         (4)  Any two or more co-owners of the immovable property may submit their written offers or counter written offers until one of them makes the highest written offer.


         (5)  The Court shall declare the highest bidder as auction purchaser in internal auction and direct the auction purchaser to deposit the auction price within fifteen days of the auction but the auction purchaser may deduct from the auction price to be deposited such amount as equals his share in the immovable property.


         (6)  If the auction purchaser deposits the auction price under subsection (5) within the prescribed time, the Court shall confirm the sale, put the auction purchaser in possession of the property and distribute the auction price amongst the other co-owners according to their respective shares.


         (7)  If the auction purchaser fails to deposit the auction price under subsection (5) within the prescribed time, the Court shall fix another date for internal auction but such auction purchaser shall not participate in the subsequent internal auctions.


         (8)  The second or subsequent internal auction shall be held, as far as possible, in accordance with the procedure contained in this section for the first internal auction.


 


11.    Open auction.– (1) If the co-owners refuse to participate in the internal auction or only one co-owner shows his willingness to participate in such auction or the internal auction under section 10 has failed, the Court shall fix the reserve price of the immovable property and direct open auction of the property.


         (2)  A co-owner of the immovable property may participate in the open auction of the property.


         (3)  The Court shall appoint a court auctioneer for conducting the open auction and fix fee of the court auctioneer to be paid by the co-owners in proportion to their respective shares in the immovable property.


         (4)  The court auctioneer shall submit in the Court an auction plan in the form of a public notice which shall include detailed specifications of the immovable property, the time, date and place of open auction, and the amount of bid security for participating in the open auction, and the Court may approve the auction plan with or without modification and direct its publication in such manner as it deems appropriate.


         (5)  The court auctioneer shall conduct open auction under the auction plan approved and published by the Court and direct the highest bidder to deposit–


                (a)  earnest money equal to twenty per cent of the bid price immediately on the close of bidding; and


                (b)  the remaining amount of the bid price in the court within seven days.


         (6)  The court auctioneer shall maintain the record of the auction proceedings and return the bid security to unsuccessful bidders but shall adjust the bid security of the highest bidder in the bid price.


         (7)  The court auctioneer may, in an appropriate case, accept deposit under clause (a) of subsection (5) in the form of cash, crossed cheque, demand draft or banker’s cheque against a receipt.


         (8)  The court auctioneer shall, immediately after conclusion the auction, deposit in the Court the auction price collected by him along with the auction report.


         (9)  If the highest bidder deposits the auction price under subsection (5), the Court shall confirm the sale, put the highest bidder in possession of the property and distribute the auction price amongst the co-owners according to their respective shares.


         (10)   If the highest bidder fails to deposit the auction price under subsection (5), the amount deposited by him shall stand forfeited and the immovable property shall be put to open auction again, as far as possible, in accordance with the procedure contained in this section.


 


12.    Mesne profits.– (1) Subject to sections 10 and 13, the Court may, at the time of final settlement, award mesne profits to a co-owner not in possession of the joint immovable property by deducting the same from the share of the co-owner in possession of the property or by directing the co-owner in possession of the property to pay the same to the co-owner not in possession of the property.


         (2)  The Court shall, while awarding mesne profits under subsection (1), take into account the interim mesne profits deposited under section 7.


 

13.    Private settlement.–(1) All the co-owners of the immovable property may, at any stage of the proceedings before the date of open auction of the property, submit a private settlement in the Court.     (2)  If the co-owners submit the private settlement under subsection (1), the Court shall pronounce judgment and decree in terms of the private settlement and cancel the order of open auction if already passed.

14.    Time limit for disposal of the suit.– (1) The Court shall finally dispose of the suit under this Act within six months from the date of the institution of the suit, failing which, the Court shall submit the case to the District Judge, with cogent reasons, seeking extension of time for disposal of the suit.

(2)  The District Judge may, subject to such conditions as he deems appropriate to impose, grant extension in time to dispose of the suit taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case.

15.    Application of Act V of 1908.– Subject to this Act, the provisions of the Code shall apply to any proceedings under this Act.

16.    Instructions of High Court.– The Lahore High Court may issue instructions necessary for purposes of the Act.

17.    Repeal.– (1) The Partition Act, 1893 (IV of 1893) is hereby repealed.

  (2)  Notwithstanding the repeal of the Partition Act, 1893 (IV of 1893) and without prejudice to any previous proceedings in a suit, the suit for partition of immovable property pending in any court under the repealed Act shall be proceeded with and decided by the Court in accordance with the provisions of this Act.[

1]This Act was passed by the Punjab Assembly on 27 December 2012; assented to by the Governor of the Punjab on 3 January 2013; and, was published in the Punjab Gazette (Extraordinary), dated 5 January 2013, pages 1961-65.

[2]The following subsection (3) omitted by the Punjab Partition of Immovable Property (Amendment) Act 2015 (X of 2015):“

(3) Notwithstanding anything in subsection (1) but subject to subsection (2), the Court may, on an application of one or more co-owners who desires his or their shares in the immovable property partitioned, appoint a referee who shall determine whether such share or shares is partible and if so, he shall propose partition of the property to that extent.”

Fasad-fil-Arz

                     No Bail                     Fasad-fil-Arz                       2024 LHC 3700      An offence committed in the name or ...